Cell is a Biochemical Computer: How Many Biologists Recognize It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reasonmclucus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Computer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of the cell as a biochemical computer with molecular memory, emphasizing its complexity compared to traditional electronic computers. It highlights how cells process inputs, such as proteins, based on genetic instructions stored in chromosomes, which are arranged in a manner that allows efficient information representation. The conversation also touches on the potential roles of "junk" DNA and the ongoing research in Amsterdam aimed at creating silicon cells to simulate biological processes. Participants agree that understanding cells as computers can enhance insights into their functions and capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular biology and cellular functions
  • Familiarity with genetic coding and DNA structure
  • Knowledge of computational biology concepts
  • Awareness of current biotechnological research, particularly in synthetic biology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of "junk" DNA in cellular functions
  • Explore the principles of molecular computing and its applications
  • Investigate the development of silicon cells and their potential uses
  • Learn about the comparison between biological and electronic computing systems
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, molecular biologists, computational biologists, and researchers interested in synthetic biology and the intersection of biology and technology.

reasonmclucus
Messages
197
Reaction score
0
How many biologists recognize that the cell is a biochemical computer with molecular memory? I don't mean it is similar to a computer or analogous to a computer. The cell is one design that might be chosen by someone building a molecular level self replicating computer, particularly for robotic applications.

The cell receives inputs,such as a protein, processes the inputs according to instructions in its memory and then produces a protein output. Biologists often think of the cell's memory, its chromosomes, as consisting of four bases and ignore the special way in which they are arranged. Each two bit "byte" consists of one of two sets of bases and one of the two members of the set will be in the "0 bit" position. This arrangment allows one bit to effectively represent two bits worth of information, a strategy also contemplated for quantum computers.

Recognizing that the cell is a computer would help understand how the cell functions and the role of those sections of DNA sometimes referred to as "junk" DNA. For example, some of this DNA might function as a "data statement" -- an area of information used as values for various instructions.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
A cell is not only a computer but an intelligent machine. It's internal programming (a typical human cell only expresses a small portion of its full genome) allows it to carry out specific function that a computer can only "dream" about. Most biologist will not compare a cell do a computer because a cell is way more complicated.
 
This is funny, because I remember back in grade school when I first encountered the functions of the cell. I was like, WOW this is exactly like a computer! And then as I grew older, now in university, I don't think that anymore. If anything, the computer is IMO a crappy model of the cell.
 
I agree with the comments so far, that the cell is a much more advanced computer in its synergy of processes compared to an electronic computer. However, I do understand reasonmclucus question. In slightly different wording, do biologists recognize that biological processes may be used to perform computations? Yes I do.
 
A research group in Amsterdam is trying to build a silicon cell. You input all the chemical reactions, after which you can do simulations with it. Ofcourse it will be hard to capture the true nature of a living cell.

http://www.bio.vu.nl/hwconf/Silicon/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
first impression differences, temporarily

cell shape is more flexible, less rigid, can't be taken apart and put back together as easily, most require constant power to survive, sometimes need computers help to survive although computers need cells help to survive.
Interesting thoughts.



Gil of surrealcity.com
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K