Central force field-condition for closed orbits.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
humanist rho
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A particle moves in the central force field [itex]\overrightarrow{F}=-kr^{n}\hat{r}[/itex] , where k is a constant, and r is the distance from the origin. For what values of n closed stable orbits are possible?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I thought for stable configuration Kinetic energy = potential energy.

for central force field,

[itex]\frac{mv^{2}}{r}=-kr^{n}[/itex]

ie,[itex]KE,\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=-kr^{(n+1)}[/itex]

and [itex]PE = -\int Fdr=\frac{kr^{(n+1)}}{n+1}[/itex]

For stabe configuration,

[itex]-kr^{(n+1)}=\frac{kr^{(n+1)}}{n+1}[/itex]

n=-2

But the answer says there's two turning points at n=1 and n=-1.
I think my method is absolutely wrong. :cry:

Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
humanist rho said:
I thought for stable configuration Kinetic energy = potential energy.
This can't be correct. For 1/r2 forces, for example, the potential energy is negative, so it obviously can't be equal to the kinetic energy. Also, the kinetic energy and potential energy vary over an orbit, so even if they were equal at one time, they wouldn't be equal later.

Any other ideas on what's required for a stable orbit?
 
Thank you vela.
vela said:
Any other ideas on what's required for a stable orbit?


The energy should be a minimum for a stable orbit.is that correct?