Centre of mass frame in nuclear reactions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the center of mass frame in the context of nuclear reactions. Participants explore the implications of mass changes on the center of mass frame before and after reactions, including both non-relativistic and relativistic considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the treatment of the center of mass frame in nuclear reactions, questioning the assumption that the center of mass frame remains constant despite changes in mass.
  • Another participant notes that momentum conservation implies that if the total momentum is zero before the interaction, it will also be zero after, but emphasizes that the formula for the center of mass velocity is a non-relativistic approximation.
  • A participant introduces the relativistic formula for the speed of the center of mass, which incorporates relativistic effects through the Lorentz factor.
  • There is a discussion about the treatment of massless particles and whether dividing total momentum by total energy (in units where c=1) would be appropriate to account for them.
  • One participant confirms that the relativistic formula accounts for mass changes, suggesting that the frame with zero momentum is consistent before and after the reaction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of momentum conservation and the need for a relativistic approach, but there is some uncertainty regarding the implications of mass changes on the center of mass frame and the treatment of massless particles.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on non-relativistic approximations and the assumptions made about mass changes in nuclear reactions, which may not hold in all cases, particularly with light particles.

AntiElephant
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm slightly confused as to how we discuss centre of mass frames in nuclear reactions.

We have the reaction a(A,B)b. Before the reaction we can transfer to the centre of mass frame

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i v_i}{\sum m_i}

and note that the total energy before the reaction is

E_{CM} = E_{masses~before} + E_{kinetic~before~in~CM}

And the total energy after is

E_{CM} = E_{masses~after} + E_{kinetic~after~in~CM}

The problem I'm having to understand is that these two before/after energies are often equated, but the centre of mass frame is not a constant since the masses are not constant in a nuclear reaction, so v_c changes since the denominator \sum m_i changes (numerator remains the same due to conservation of momentum).

Am I wrong here? If I were to guess why we can do this, it's because the change in masses is so small that we can assume the centre of mass frame is constant before/after the reaction. But then this discussion breaks down when we're considering only light particles and the fractional mass change is larger, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I wrong here? If I were to guess why we can do this, it's because the change in masses is so small that we can assume the centre of mass frame is constant before/after the reaction. But then this discussion breaks down when we're considering only light particles and the fractional mass change is larger, right?

Momentum is conserved. If you work in a frame where total momentum is zero before the interaction then total momentum will also be zero after the interaction.

The formula:

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i v_i}{\sum m_i}

is a non-relativistic approximation. It will not, in general, correctly tell you the relative velocity of the frame in which total momentum is zero.
 
The relativistic formula for the speed of the center of mass is

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i \gamma_i v_i}{\sum m_i \gamma_i},

where \gamma_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}}
 
dauto said:
The relativistic formula for the speed of the center of mass is

v_c = \frac{\sum m_i \gamma_i v_i}{\sum m_i \gamma_i},

where \gamma_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}}

That seems not to account for the possibility of massless particles moving at light speed. May I assume that one would simply divide total momentum by total energy (using units in which c=1) to cover that case?
 
jbriggs444 said:
That seems not to account for the possibility of massless particles moving at light speed. May I assume that one would simply divide total momentum by total energy (using units in which c=1) to cover that case?

Yes.
 
So the frame in which the momentum is zero, is the same before and after a nuclear reaction, because the actual formula takes relativistic mass changes into account?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K