Centripetal Acceleration on a car

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between lateral acceleration at each wheel of a car and the acceleration experienced by its center of gravity (COG). It highlights the traction circle concept, which indicates that each tire has a friction budget that must not be exceeded during cornering. The lateral acceleration can be expressed in terms of the car's speed and radius of curvature, with a consistent angular velocity across the vehicle. While the radius of curvature varies for different wheels, the average lateral acceleration at the COG aligns with the overall dynamics of the car. The use of an accelerometer at the COG is suggested for measuring traction, despite the complexity of assessing individual wheel traction.
Raag90
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Ok so for my final year project I've researched about traction and slip, etc, and I came across the traction circle, where each tyre has a specified 'budget' of friction that should never be exceeded during cornering. Now the longitudinal acceleration exerted will be different for each wheel, but my question was does the lateral acceleration exerted by each wheel have any correlation so the acceleration experienced by the centre of gravity? I was planning on using an accelerometer at the COG of the model car I had to be able to give an indication of the traction budget for the car, until I realized that the traction must be specified at each wheel (which would be tricky to do).

Any ideas much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Raag90! :smile:
Raag90 said:
… does the lateral acceleration exerted by each wheel have any correlation so the acceleration experienced by the centre of gravity? I was planning on using an accelerometer at the COG of the model car …

If an object has instantaneous radius of curvature r, and speed v, then the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=27"(lateral acceleration) is v2/r.

We can also write this as ω2r, where ω is the angular velocity, v/r … this has the advantage that ω is the same for every part of the car (which v is not).

Obviously, the centre of the car has a smaller r than the outside tyres, and a larger r than the inside tyres, but the average value of ω2r will be the same as ω2r for the centre of mass. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top