Centripetal accelerations with two parallel axes - the Scrambler

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating centripetal accelerations for an object rotating around two parallel axes, specifically in the context of the "Scrambler" amusement park ride. The key approach involves determining the net centripetal acceleration at point C by calculating the centripetal acceleration relative to both the major and minor axes, and then finding the difference between them. The position vector of the rider is expressed in Cartesian coordinates, with the acceleration components derived from the second derivative of the position vector. The methodology confirms that the tangential velocity used for calculations should be that of the major arm at point C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal acceleration concepts
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates and vector calculus
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its implications in rotational motion
  • Ability to differentiate functions to find acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of centripetal acceleration in multi-axis rotations
  • Learn how to derive position vectors in inertial frames of reference
  • Explore the mathematical representation of angular velocity and its effects on motion
  • Investigate online resources or simulations that illustrate centripetal forces in amusement park rides
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotational motion, particularly in complex systems involving multiple axes of rotation.

fezzik
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Centripetal accelerations with two parallel axes -- the "Scrambler"

Homework Statement


This should be a pretty quick and straightforward question to answer. The problem regards centripetal forces on an object rotating simultaneously around two parallel axes, like in the "Scrambler" amusement park ride. Basically, one object has uniform circular motion around a minor axis, while this minor axis simultaneously rotates around a major axis (both axes are in the same plane). (Check out the animation at http://www.mrwaynesclass.com/teacher/circular/cd/scrambler/home.html and the problems at http://vip.vast.org/Circ_Lab/big_act/index.htm ).

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me you can find the net centripetal acceleration on the rider at point C (where the rider gets closest to the major axis) by finding (1) the centripetal acceleration relative to the major axis and (2) the centripetal acceleration relative to the minor axis, and then (3) subtracting one from the other (since, at C, the two accelerations are in opposite directions). It also seems to make sense that, when (1) calculating the centripetal acceleration relative to the major axis, the radius is given by the distance between C and the major axis, and the velocity is given by the tangential velocity of the major arm (and not by the absolute tangential velocity of the rider) at C -- is that correct?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Maybe someone can recommend an online reference that explains this kind of situation? (I.e., how to calculate the total centripetal acceleration of an object rotating around a centre of rotation, while that centre of rotation itself rotates around another centre of rotation -- both centres of rotation in the same plane.)
 


Is there another category in the forum where I should be posting this question instead?
 


What is the question? To find the centripetal acceleration in the inertial frame of reference in general, or at point C? Your result looks correct, that the the centripetal acceleration is the difference between that with respect to the major axis and the one with respect to the minor axis.

I would solve the general problem by writing out the position vector of the rider in the inertial frame of reference, and would take the second derivative with respect to time to get the acceleration. Than I would determine the radial component with respect to the main axis.

ehild
 


Thanks! Well, it's a bit over my head to try to figure out what function describes the position of the rider, so it sounds like I can just take the approach I described (basically, (1) ignoring the rotation around the minor axis in order to find the rider's acceleration around the major axis alone; then (2) ignoring the rotation around the major axis, that is, assuming it is fixed, in order to find the rider's acceleration around the minor axis alone; then, (3) finding the difference between the two accelerations). For clarification, I am trying to find the total centripetal acceleration on the rider when he/she's at point C, when viewed in an inertial frame of reference.

Also for clarification, the main thing I had wanted to confirm was that when (1) calculating the centripetal acceleration relative to the major axis alone, the velocity is given by the tangential velocity of the major arm (and not by the absolute tangential velocity of the rider) at C) -- and it sounds like you have confirmed that that approach is correct.
 


For me it is easier to think in Descartes coordinates:
You have two systems, A with origin O and B with origin O'. The position vector of O' is R(t) in system A. You have an object, and its position is r'(t) in system B. In system A, the position vector is

r(t) = R(t) + r'(t)

O' moves along a circle of radius R around O with angular velocity Ω, so its coordinates are:

X=Rcos(Ωt), Y=Rsin(Ωt).

In system B, the rider moves along a circle with radius r around O' with angular velocity ω', its coordinates are

x=rcos(ω't), y=rsin(ω't).

The coordinates will be

x=Rcos(Ωt)+rcos(ω't), y=Rsin(Ωt)+rsin(ω't)

in system A.

The components of acceleration:

ax=-[RcosΩ2(Ωt)+rω'2cos(ω't)],

ay=-[RsinΩ2(Ωt)+rω'2sin(ω't)].

The centripetal acceleration in A is the radial component of the vector a, the dot product of a with the radial unit vector, r/r.

ehild
 


Thanks for the detailed description, that's great -- I'll take some time to digest it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
989
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K