Centripetal and centrifugal forces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of centripetal and centrifugal forces in the context of a rotating space station and the forces experienced by a person inside a box connected to it. The original poster presents a scenario involving a box rotating at a certain speed and questions the forces acting on them due to this rotation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of forces in non-inertial reference frames, questioning the validity of centrifugal force and its implications on perceived forces. There are attempts to reconcile Newton's laws with the experiences of individuals in accelerating frames.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the application of Newton's third law and the calculations of forces involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of forces in non-inertial frames, but there remains a lack of consensus on the exact values and implications of these forces.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing discussions about the assumptions made in the problem, including the mass of the box and the forces acting on the person inside it. Some participants express confusion regarding the calculations and the application of physical laws in this context.

adjacent
Gold Member
Messages
1,552
Reaction score
62

Homework Statement


A space station is connected to a box(50kg) with a super strong string(1m) and it is rotating which makes the box rotate at a speed of 10m/s.
I am inside the box.
Find the force the box exerts on me.

Homework Equations


##F=m\frac{v^2}{r}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I found that centripetal force=5000N.
This force is exerted on the box by the string.
According to my experience,the "me" in the box would try to move opposite to the centripetal force direction but I heard that centrifugal force is not a real force.
So is the force exerted on me 5000N or something else?Can you explain why Newton's third law does not apply here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When we say centrifugal and coriolis forces are not real we mean they are virtual and they only exist if you are in a non-inertial reference frame,they are necessary to describe the motion in a non-inertial reference frame and you do experience it.

In your given problem , "you" will experience a force mv^2/r along the radius i.e. radially outwards

Now when you choose a non-inertial reference frame i.e. your reference frame itself is accelerating , you have to account for that acceleration too, and with your perspective the object you observe will also have an apparent acceleration due to your reference frame's acceleration.
This is why when you are rotating ( which is an accelerated motion ) you have to introduce these virtual forces.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oh.I understand now.
I have another similar problem:
The person A is inside a box and he is being accelerated at 10m/s^2 upwards.There are no external forces(Gravity,air resistance etc.)
A's mass is 50kg and the box is 1kg.
So according to Newton's second law,the upward force is 510N.
So,will I experience that 510N downwards?
I don't think so.If he exerts a 510N downwards and the rocket exerts a 510N upwards,the box would no longer be accelerating :confused:
 
adjacent said:
I found that centripetal force=5000N.
This force is exerted on the box by the string.
That would be true if the box were empty, but the question asks for the force the box exerts on you. Why would that be 5000N?
Can you explain why Newton's third law does not apply here?
It does apply. In an inertial reference frame, the force on you is unbalanced and results in an acceleration towards the spaceship. In your own frame, you are not accelerating but feel the force from the box, hence you invent centrifugal force to balance it.
 
haruspex said:
That would be true if the box were empty, but the question asks for the force the box exerts on you. Why would that be 5000N?
I can't find any other way to find a different value for the force :confused:
 
adjacent said:
Oh.I understand now.
I have another similar problem:
The person A is inside a box and he is being accelerated at 10m/s^2 upwards.There are no external forces(Gravity,air resistance etc.)
A's mass is 50kg and the box is 1kg.
So according to Newton's second law,the upward force is 510N.
So,will I experience that 510N downwards?
I don't think so.If he exerts a 510N downwards and the rocket exerts a 510N upwards,the box would no longer be accelerating :confused:
You will exert a force on the box of 50 x 10 = 500 N. The box exerts a force on you of 500 N. The total force on the box is the applied external force of 510 N minus the 500 N that you are exerting, ie. 10 N , so the box accelerates at 10 m/sec^2.

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Andrew Mason said:
You will exert a force on the box of 50 x 10 = 500 N. The box exerts a force on you of 500 N. The total force on the box is the applied external force of 510 N minus the 500 N that you are exerting, ie. 10 N , so the box accelerates at 10 m/sec^2.

AM
Thank you so much Andrew! This makes sense now :smile:
but:
Me said:
I can't find any other way to find a different value for the force :confused:
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mason said:
You will exert a force on the box of 50 x 10 = 500 N. The box exerts a force on you of 500 N. The total force on the box is the applied external force of 510 N minus the 500 N that you are exerting, ie. 10 N , so the box accelerates at 10 m/sec^2.

AM
Andrew, please reread the question. 50kg is the mass of the box, and has nothing to do with the force the box exerts on anyone inside it. Adjacent, to find the force it asks for you will need to weigh yourself.
Also, the speed of the box is 10m/s and the string is 1m long, so v2/r = 100, not 10. I don 't know where you got the 10N from.
 
haruspex said:
Andrew, please reread the question. 50kg is the mass of the box, and has nothing to do with the force the box exerts on anyone inside it.
I was responding the post #3 which I quoted. In that scenario, the A is 50 kg. and the box is 1 kg.

AM
 
  • #10
Andrew Mason said:
I was responding the post #3 which I quoted. In that scenario, the A is 50 kg. and the box is 1 kg.

AM
Apologies. :blushing:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K