Centripetal Force Problem: Determine Vehicle Speed and Forces | 1988M1 Homework

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a centripetal force problem related to a vehicle negotiating a banked curve with a radius of 100 meters and a banking angle of 15°. The vehicle speed for which this curve is appropriate without friction is derived using the equation for centripetal force, F = mv²/r. The conversation clarifies that gravitational force does not contribute to centripetal force in this scenario, and friction can act in the direction of motion depending on the vehicle's speed relative to the calculated speed without friction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its equation (F = mv²/r)
  • Knowledge of forces acting on an object on an inclined plane
  • Familiarity with the concept of friction and its directionality
  • Basic trigonometry, particularly sine and cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of friction on vehicle dynamics in banked curves
  • Learn about the role of normal force in centripetal motion
  • Explore the concept of angular velocity and its relation to centripetal acceleration
  • Investigate the impact of varying banking angles on vehicle speed and safety
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in understanding vehicle dynamics on curved paths.

dragonx47
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1988M1. A highway curve that has a radius of curvature of 100 meters is
banked at an angle of 15° as shown above.
a.Determine the vehicle speed for which this curve is appropriate if there is no friction between the road and the tires of the vehicle.

On a dry day when friction is present, an automobile successfully negotiates the curve at a speed of 25 m/s.

b.Draw and label all of the forces on the automobile.

Homework Equations


Centripetal force = mv^2 / r
(I know how to do the problem, but I'm not sure why what I'm supposed to do is correct)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that in part a) the centripetal force is provided by the horizontal component of the normal force (Nsin(15)), but shouldn't the gravitational force also play a role? The mgsin(15) component is pushing the car down the ramp, which is pushing the car closer towards the center, albeit at an angle.

For part b) I've been told that the friction force points down the ramp and that its horizontal component contributes to the net centripetal force, but shouldn't it be pointing up the ramp to counteract mgsin(theta)? Furthermore, since friction opposes the direction of motion, shouldn't it be pointing away from the center since that's where the cart is moving towards?

Thanks!
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, welcome to PF!

The force of gravity, mg, acts vertically. So, it does not have a centripetal component. You could break up the gravity force into components along the slop (mgsinθ) and perpendicular to the slope (mgcosθ). But it is confusing to do this for this type of problem. Your are right that mgsinθ by itself has a component toward the center. But what about the mgcosθ part? Does it have a component toward or away from the center?

Friction does not always oppose the direction of motion. When you start to walk, the friction forces on your feet act in the direction you start moving.

The cart is not moving toward the center. That is, it always keeps the same distance from the center. The velocity vector is always perpendicular to the radius of the circle.
 
Thanks! But how do we know that friction is pointing towards the center?
 
When you work out part (a) you will know the speed required when there is no friction. If the speed in (b) is faster than what you get in (a), which way would friction need to point so that you can still go around the curve? Up the slope or down the slope?
 
dragonx47 said:
I know that in part a) the centripetal force is provided by the horizontal component of the normal force (Nsin(15)), but shouldn't the gravitational force also play a role? The mgsin(15) component is pushing the car down the ramp, which is pushing the car closer towards the center, albeit at an angle.

The force mg points downward. A component of it, mg sin 15°, points down the hill. Your intuition is that it must play some role? Well, it does. It plays the same role it would play if the car were moving either up or down the hill. But as far as the car moving a horizontal direction, it plays no role.

For part b) I've been told that the friction force points down the ramp and that its horizontal component contributes to the net centripetal force, but shouldn't it be pointing up the ramp to counteract mgsin(theta)?

Again, if the car were moving up or down the hill, the friction force would oppose that motion. So if the car starts to drift up the hill, a friction force would act down the hill to oppose that motion.

Furthermore, since friction opposes the direction of motion, shouldn't it be pointing away from the center since that's where the cart is moving towards

If the car is spiraling outward we wouldn't say it's moving away from the center! As long as its path is concave towards the center we would say, for purposes of describing how it's instantaneous direction is changing, we would say it's moving towards the center.

Think of centripetal as a direction, not a force. If the car's path is concave inward, there is an inward net force. In the same way the path of a projectile is concave downwards because there is a downward net force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K