Centripetal Force - trying to find time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a physicist standing 10 feet from the center of a rotating platform, where a weight hangs at a 10° angle from the vertical. The key equations used include centripetal acceleration a = v²/R and the force equations Tcos(10°) = mg and Tsin(10°) = ma. By analyzing the forces acting on the weight and simplifying the equations, the final calculated velocity is 7.51 ft/s. The approach effectively utilizes free-body diagrams and the relationship between tension and centripetal force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and acceleration concepts
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams in physics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving tension and mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration formulas
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free-body diagrams in various contexts
  • Explore the relationship between tension, mass, and acceleration in rotational systems
  • Investigate the effects of centrifugal forces in rotating reference frames
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rotating systems and centripetal force calculations.

cdornz
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A physicist is standing 10 feet from the center of a platform that can rotate about a vertical axis - the platform is horizontal. She is holding a weight that is hanging freely from a string. The platform starts rotating and eventually she notices that the weight is no longer hanging straight down but is making an angle of 10° with the vertical. How fast is she moving at that time?


Homework Equations


Normally, for centripetal equations I would use a=v2/R
I've also used the equation Fcentripetal=4∏2Mf2R


The Attempt at a Solution


I've never had to solve a centripetal force equation with knowing the mass of either the person or the weight or without a velocity. I'm honestly not quite sure what route to go to solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free-body diagram for the weight.
Once you take x- and y-components, you should be able to cancel the mass out.
 
So I'm not sure if I drew this correctly or not, but drawing out the free body diagram for the weight, would those components cancel out with the tension of the string?
 
It should be clear from your diagram that the y-component of the tension cancels out the weight.
The x-component of the tension will be the only horizontal force on the object - this provides the centripetal force.

Have you written out the components? They should simplify down to a simple expression.
 
For components, I would have:

Ftension; the y-component pointing upwards canceled out with the weight of the mass pointing downwards. There is no Ffriction since the object is in the air. Otherwise, I'm not sure what other forces.

I could be going about this completely wrong, but from other examples I had, I used force equations such as

\SigmaFx = Fnet
Ftension = ma

Problem I run into with this, is that I don't have a way of calculating the mass or the acceleration. All I know is that the angle of the mass is 280° from the +x axis.
 
So, for the y-components, you have
Tcos(10°) - mg = 0
→ Tcos(10°) = mg

and for the x-components,
Tsin(10°) = ma
where a is the centripetal acceleration

(your components may be slightly different depending on your axes)

If you insert the expression for centripetal acceleration and combine these 2 equations, you can get rid of T and m.
 
Sneaky approach:

If you consider the string and weight to be stationary in a rotating frame of reference (think of taking a snapshot of the rotating platform at some instant of time when you have a profile view of the happenings) then it becomes fair to speak about centrifugal forces and accelerations in that frame of reference. It turns out that these centrifugal effects have the same magnitude but opposite direction to our usual centripetal ones. Then, using Newton's second law f = ma, we can drop the constant m's and label a diagram with accelerations rather than forces:

attachment.php?attachmentid=54009&stc=1&d=1355762164.gif


Does this give you any ideas about solving for ac?
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2 KB · Views: 598
ap123 said:
So, for the y-components, you have
Tcos(10°) - mg = 0
→ Tcos(10°) = mg

and for the x-components,
Tsin(10°) = ma
where a is the centripetal acceleration

(your components may be slightly different depending on your axes)

If you insert the expression for centripetal acceleration and combine these 2 equations, you can get rid of T and m.

So I went with this and worked with the axes a bit to make it make more sense to me. I ended up with this as a result:

\SigmaFx=max
Tx+(mg)x = max
T(cos100°) +mg(cos270°) = ma(cos180°)
T(cos100°) = -ma
T(cos100°) = -mv2/R

T(sin100°) - mg = 0
T(sin100°)/g = m

T(cos100°) = -T(sin100°)/g * v2/R

My final equation was v2 = (T(cos100°))gR/-T(sin100°)
v2= -55.56t/-0.98t = 56.47 which I then took the square root of and so the velocity ended up being 7.51ft/s.

Did I go about this correctly?
 
Your final answer agrees with mine :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K