Centripetal Force Homework: Effect of Increasing Mass on Revolutions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of increasing mass on the time taken for an object to complete multiple revolutions in a centripetal force context. The original poster is exploring the relationship between mass and revolution time, hypothesizing an inverse relationship.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the influence of varying mass on centripetal force and revolution time, questioning the assumptions made regarding the relationship. Some suggest considering other variables such as length or angle while varying mass.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and questioning the original poster's assumptions. There are indications of potential errors in the original equations and relationships presented, prompting further exploration of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note specific errors in the original poster's equations and the importance of considering tension in the string as a contributing factor to centripetal force. There is also mention of a hint from a teacher regarding linearization, which raises questions about the interpretation of variables.

Richer Su
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Refer to this pic https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/rallain/plab193/page1/page37/page37.htmlor
I was wondering how increasing the mass at the bottom would influence the time taken for the object to complete 10 revolutions, my hypothesis was that it would decrease in an inverse ration manner of which I am still trying the find mathematically[/B]

Homework Equations


I understand that the centripetal force is F=mv^2/r
And the V=d/t = 2(pi)r/t
therefore the equation is
F=m(2(pi)r/t)^2 all divded by radius

The Attempt at a Solution


The
mass m1 will be the mass of a rubber stopper moving at a constant tangential speed of athttps://www.physicsforums.com/file:///C:/Users/RICHER~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image002.png the end of a nylon cord of length.https://www.physicsforums.com/file:///C:/Users/RICHER~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image004.png The centripetal force will be supplied by a mass thathttps://www.physicsforums.com/file:///C:/Users/RICHER~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image006.png is attached to the bottom of the nylon cord. See the above figure. Mass will include both the slotted mass and a hanger. The weight of this hanging mass is determined by the equation:https://www.physicsforums.com/file:///C:/Users/RICHER~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image008.png The weight of the hanging mass is the centripetal force applied to the mass https://www.physicsforums.com/file:///C:/Users/RICHER~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image010.png, keeping it in a horizontal circular orbit.

or
https://www.physicsforums.com/file:///C:/Users/RICHER~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image014.png
the final result in terms of T period was
See capture10000.Png
I'm not sure if this relationship is inverse manner and whether it is mathematically correct.
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Capture10000.PNG
    Capture10000.PNG
    1.1 KB · Views: 510
Physics news on Phys.org
the
 

Attachments

  • Capture12.PNG
    Capture12.PNG
    6 KB · Views: 525
Richer Su said:
I was wondering how increasing the mass at the bottom would influence the time taken for the object to complete 10 revolutions
There is another free variable. E.g. you could specify L to remain constant as you vary M, or θ constant, or the speed. The answer to your question might depend on which you choose.
 
Richer Su said:
the
There is an error in the text in capture12. It says the weight of the hanging mass equals the centripetal force. What has been overlooked?
 
Is the tension of the string that is being overlooked as that also is a contributing factor to the centripetal force?
 
My teacher gave me this hint but I'm not sure what the lowercase f stands for
See capture13 below
He said to Linearizing the equation, from this I was guessing that I would get a logarithmic function
 

Attachments

  • Capture13.PNG
    Capture13.PNG
    5.4 KB · Views: 551
Richer Su said:
My teacher gave me this hint but I'm not sure what the lowercase f stands for
See capture13 below
He said to Linearizing the equation, from this I was guessing that I would get a logarithmic function
f stands for frequency here, but capture13 makes the same error as capture12, and others beside.

First, ΣFnet makes no sense. Fnet is the sum of forces, so ΣF=Fnet.
Secondly, Fnet is not the tension; there is also gravity.
The blunder capture12 and capture13 make is that they ignore the angle.

If T is the tension, can you write the expressions for the vertical sum of forces and the horizontal sum of forces?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K