Centripetal Force vs Radius: Exploring Uniform Acceleration Lab Results

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between centripetal force (Fc) and radius (r) in a uniform acceleration lab experiment involving a rubber stopper. The graph produced was a horizontal line, indicating that centripetal force is not directly proportional to radius under the conditions tested. The analysis reveals that while mass (m) remained constant, the period (T) varied, affecting the relationship between Fc and r. The tension in the string, which equates to centripetal force, was also inconsistent, leading to confusion about the graph's interpretation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its formula (Fc = mv²/r)
  • Knowledge of uniform circular motion and its parameters
  • Familiarity with graphing relationships between physical quantities
  • Basic principles of experimental design in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between tension and centripetal force in circular motion experiments
  • Learn about the effects of varying mass and period on centripetal force
  • Explore the principles of experimental control and variable manipulation
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of centripetal force equations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone conducting experiments related to circular motion and centripetal force analysis.

BlueCardBird
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
During a lab, we had to plot graph between Centripetal Force vs Radius of rubber stopper (some uniform acceleration lab) the result i got was a horizontal line. Then a question asks Based on your graph of centripetal force vs. radius of rubber stopper's motion, can you conclude that centripetal force is directly proportional to the radius of the rubber stoppers motion? Explain your answer. I'm just wondering if my answer makes sense.

Based on our graph, it states that the theoretical centripetal force is not proportional to the radius of the rubber stoppers motion. Since Fc=m.a and a=4π²r/T² then Fc=m (4π²r/T²), basically we are only graphing the Fc’s relationship to r. This statement can only be held true if the mass is constant, and T is constant. In this case, though m stays constant, T does not, and that is why the graph does not display a direct proportionality between Fc and r.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What were the axes of the graph and what variables did you keep constant? What were the details of the experiment. You haven't told us enough to be able to help you yet. This is a Physics Forum, not a Psychic one. :biggrin:
 
Think about this. What was the tension in the string balanced by? Could that change? What would happen if T were greater - or less?
 
The T is dependent upon the mass at the bottom, in our case we used washers, Fg=Ft=Fc
 
So what dependent variable was staying constant during the experiment (i.e. the vertical axis)? You haven't said what were the axes on your graph.
 
the vertical axis was the Centripetal Force and Horizontal axis was the Radius
 
This does not compute for me. The centripetal force is the same as the tension in the string - which is the weight hanging on the bottom. You said that varies - so how do you get a horizontal line if the y co-ordinates (i.e. weights hanging on the string) are not all the same?
 
the y values are the same, it is that radius that is changing
 
  • #10
That makes no sense if you are plotting tension (y) against radius (x) and you say the tension is varying.
 
  • #11
no, what I'm saying is that Tension is the same but the radius is changing; also period is changing aswell.
 
  • #12
Of course you can arrange for many combinations of radius and speed which will give the same tension. The instructions you quoted included varying the tension. It would have helped if you had bothered to describe your particular experiment instead of leaving us to read that doc (as I asked at the start).
 
Last edited:
  • #13
The formula for the tension in the string is
T = mv2/r

If you are keeping T constant, shouldn't you be plotting r against v, rather than r against T, which you are keeping constant by adjusting v?

To yield a useful result, an experiment needs to reveal the relationship between two variables whilst all others are kept constant. Isn't that the basis of the scientific approach?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K