Ceres/Mars as manufacturing outposts (analytic exercise)

Click For Summary
Ceres is unique as the only icy body in the inner solar system, retaining water unlike Venus and Mars, which are mostly dry. While Mars has significant frozen water, Ceres' low gravity makes it a more cost-effective option for establishing a human base, as missions to Ceres require less fuel due to its lower escape velocity. The radiation environment on Ceres is also less hazardous compared to Mars and Jupiter's moons, making it easier to build and maintain structures. Additionally, the cost of transporting materials and fuel is a critical factor, with Ceres offering lower overall mission expenses despite being further away. Ultimately, Ceres presents a compelling case for being the first human settlement in space due to its resource availability and reduced operational costs.
  • #31
mfb said:
@marcus: an Earth orbit is certainly an interesting target for all sorts of materials. If you find some cheaper way than rocket launches from Earth, it is interesting.
WOW! Thanks for pointing that out!
I was thinking, oh well, the Earth has plenty of resources. Ceres would never be selling chemical/material products to Earth.
But maybe that's short-sighted. Maybe Earth orbit would be a possible customer for a Ceres chemical industry.

I don't feel able to evaluate that possibility and do the numbers based on realistic assumptions, so I can't pursue it. Just have to keep the possibility in mind, avoid dismissing it.

At the moment some questions in my mind are:
Does Ceres have nitrogen---N-containing minerals, ammonium compounds?
Does it have a range of metals, in surface rubble, or accessible in other places?
Presumably it does have water, and some compounds of carbon---that seems fair to assume.

Where might there eventually be a market for Ceres water? It is probably some of the cheapest water in the inner solar system. Johnny Morales made this point in post #2 of this thread. But what sort of customers might there be? And where might they be located?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Not sure if it was already mentioned, but Ceres does have the added benefit of having launch window periods at a little more than a year over Mars' 26 months. Launches can be done at nearly twice the frequency for Ceres, even if it is double the distance of Mars. No matter what, any current mission will have to deal with leaving Earth to get to its destination, or vice versa. This huge difference in launch windows may play a big role in maintaining any sort of mining/manufacturing base on Ceres versus immediately colonizing Mars.
 
  • #33
Where is the point in having more frequent launch windows if the trip between Ceres and Earth takes as long as the time between Mars launch windows (26 months)?
Only in rare occasions (Mars launch window closed recently, Ceres launch window coming soon) Ceres would be "faster" to reach.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K