CGS Units in Physics: Use & Benefits

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transition from SI/MKS units to CGS units in electromagnetism (EM) courses, highlighting the perceived cleanliness of CGS expressions, which eliminate constants like epsilon0 and mu0. Participants emphasize that while CGS units may simplify certain equations, the real-world application of units varies across fields such as atomic physics and particle physics. The consensus is that mastering one system of units is crucial for consistency, and the choice of units often depends on the specific context or community, such as nonlinear optics, which frequently utilizes CGS units.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SI and MKS units in physics
  • Familiarity with electromagnetism concepts
  • Knowledge of atomic and particle physics unit systems
  • Basic grasp of nonlinear optics terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between SI and CGS units in electromagnetism
  • Explore the application of CGS units in atomic physics
  • Learn about the role of units in particle physics and quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Investigate the use of CGS units in nonlinear optics
USEFUL FOR

Students in electromagnetism courses, physicists transitioning between unit systems, and researchers in atomic and particle physics seeking clarity on unit applications.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Up until my third year EM course we have used SI and MKS units in EM. In fact every textbook i have used for EM (griffiths,wangsness) also use those units.

My current prof wants up to learn CGS units. While they do appear much 'cleaner' (no epsilon0, mu0 for certain equations) what is their use in the real world?

What units would a physicist in his or her day to day life of physics use?? At least in north america...

is the cleanliness of expressions the only reason why these units are used??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One and only one. Just like any matter of notation or convention, the advice is learn one well and apply it everywhere. If you're taught in SI/MKS, then you'd better look for sources which use this system of units. Actually, tou'll see that atomic physics uses other system of units, particle physics/QFT another and i don't see the point of making your life more difficult using both MKS and CGS for electrodynamics.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
One and only one. Just like any matter of notation or convention, the advice is learn one well and apply it everywhere. If you're taught in SI/MKS, then you'd better look for sources which use this system of units. Actually, tou'll see that atomic physics uses other system of units, particle physics/QFT another and i don't see the point of making your life more difficult using both MKS and CGS for electrodynamics.

Daniel.

to bad my prof doesn't see it this way

i need to learn CGS now

now its going to be hard to even think i get the right answer :cry:
 
It usually depends on what scale you're working in--for instance atomic masses are measured in grams/mol rather than the SI unit kilograms/mol (which would then require a x10^-3 by each number). It really is just about convenience.
 
The nonlinear optics community also commonly uses CGS.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K