Challenging Semi-Infinite Potential Well Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a semi-infinite potential well problem, specifically modeling a deuteron with given parameters for width and potential energy. Participants are tasked with determining the energy levels and the number of excited states, while grappling with the implications of boundary conditions and wavefunction behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to find solutions for the wavefunction inside and outside the well, and how to match them at the boundaries. There are attempts to derive expressions for the wavefunctions in different regions and to apply boundary conditions, with some questioning the implications of these conditions on the coefficients of the wavefunctions.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the boundary conditions and their application to the wavefunctions. Some participants express confusion regarding the treatment of coefficients and the implications of the potential well setup. Guidance has been offered regarding the nature of bound states and the normalization of wavefunctions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves assumptions about the behavior of wavefunctions at infinity and the implications of having a bound state, which complicates the application of boundary conditions. There is also mention of the algebraic complexity involved in matching conditions, which has led to frustration among participants.

mancini0
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Use the semi - infinite well potential to model a deuteron, a nucleus consisting of a neutron and a proton. Let the well width L be 3.5 x 10^-15 meters and V - E = 2.2 MeV. Determine the energy E, and determine how many excited states there are."

Homework Equations


Since V >> E, I figured the transmission probability will be 0. I used the following equation for tunneling probability T:

T = [1 + (V^2 sinh^2(kL) / ( 4E(V-E) ))]^-1
I substituted V = 2.2MeV + E in the above equation, and used T = 0.
k was found from the following equation:
k = sqrt(2m*(V-E)) / hbar

Plugging everything yielded E = 4.96 MeV, which is wrong. The correct answer is known to be E = 7.28 MeV, with zero excited energy states.

My assumption that T = 0 must be incorrect, so I approached the problem another way. In the attached PDF, I derived an expression for Psi. Looking at this derived value for psi,
I think I need to scrap the term with the positive exponent, as then psi would approach infinity at x> L. From here do I need to normalise psi, then use the energy operator? I am having trouble doing this, as typically our HW problems only require a "plug and chug" approach. The function I found that satisfies the Schrödinger wave equation only depends on x, so using the energy operator ehat = i*hbar d/dt would yield zero, correct?

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

The Attempt at a Solution



Done above
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find solutions for inside the well and outside the well and then match them at the boundary. From that, you should come up with a condition that allows you to solve for the energy of the bound states.
 
Thank you. When x <0,
ψ1 = Aeik1x+Be-ik1x

When 0<x<L, ψ2 = Cekx+ De-kx

When x> L ,
ψ3 = Feik1x+Ge-ik1x

Now I can see how that the A term represents the incident wave, the B term represents the reflected wave, The F term represents the transmitted wave, and the G term must be zero because there is no wave moving in the -x direction in region 3. I am having trouble coming up with conditions that describe the C and D coefficents.

The k in region 2 is = sqrt(2m(V-E) / hbar
and k1 in regions 1, 3 = sqrt(2mE) / hbar.

Now attempting to apply boundary conditions...
The ψ1 wave must be 0 as x --> infinity, but if I take the limit of 1 as x --> infinity, the A term goes to infinity, so I assume A must equal 0. But the A term is the incident wave, so I can't see how I can just "delete" it like that. I know I'm thinking of it wrong, because taking the limit as x --> negative infinity would force me to delete the B term as well.

The book explicitly skipped over the application of the boundary conditions, saying the algebra is "too long". Very frustrating, as this is my first encounter with applying boundary
conditions. This stuff is fascinating. Could you give me another nudge in the right direction?
 
It's a bound state. There is no incident wave.
 
mancini0 said:
Thank you. When x <0,
ψ1 = Aeik1x+Be-ik1x

When 0<x<L, ψ2 = Cekx+ De-kx

When x> L ,
ψ3 = Feik1x+Ge-ik1x

So according to the definition of the potential this means that the function ψ1 does not exist?

In the end I believe you'll end up with two equations and three unknowns. Can someone confirm my thoughts?
 
matumich26 said:
In the end I believe you'll end up with two equations and three unknowns. Can someone confirm my thoughts?

In these types of problems, you always have one independent coefficient after matching boundary conditions; that coefficient is then determined by normalizing the wavefunction over all space.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K