- #31
TVP45
- 1,041
- 5
Danger said:
Careful. King the wonder dog may be sniffing your car as you speak.
Chances of Technology Supression
- Thread starter nuby
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Chances Technology
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of technology suppression, particularly in relation to potentially dangerous inventions and the implications for national security. Participants explore whether governments or scientific establishments would suppress knowledge of technologies that could pose threats, as well as the feasibility of creating such technologies with readily available materials.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that if dangerous technologies could be created from common materials, governments might attempt to suppress this knowledge.
- Others argue that many destructive capabilities already exist with accessible materials, and that governments primarily focus on monitoring individuals interested in such information.
- A participant references historical context, noting that the Manhattan Project's report included details about building atomic bombs, arguing that much dangerous information is already publicly available due to its peaceful applications.
- One participant posits a hypothetical scenario where a device could transform petroleum products into a harmless substance, questioning whether such knowledge would be suppressed.
- Another participant asserts that total technology suppression is unlikely, as new technologies are often developed independently by others within a short timeframe, regardless of attempts to classify or conceal them.
- There is mention of historical examples, such as the independent development of nuclear weapons by multiple nations, illustrating that knowledge tends to converge despite suppression efforts.
- Some participants dismiss certain concepts, like over-unity machines and 200 mpg carburetors, as non-existent rather than suppressed, distinguishing between dangerous but possible technologies and those deemed impossible.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement. While there is some consensus that dangerous technologies could be developed independently, opinions diverge on the extent and effectiveness of potential suppression by governments. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of technology suppression and the nature of the technologies in question.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the limitations of their arguments, including the dependence on definitions of "dangerous" technologies and the speculative nature of hypothetical scenarios. There is also an acknowledgment of the historical context of technological development and the challenges of suppressing knowledge.
Careful. King the wonder dog may be sniffing your car as you speak.
Similar threads
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 40 ·
Writing: Input Wanted
SciFi story about making all encryptions obsolete and other dilemmas
- · Replies 28 ·
- · Replies 20 ·
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 15 ·