Chances of Technology Supression

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential for technology suppression by governments and scientific establishments, particularly regarding dangerous knowledge. Participants argue that while certain technologies can pose national security threats, the inherent nature of scientific advancement makes total suppression unlikely. Historical examples, such as the Manhattan Project and independent developments of nuclear weapons, illustrate that knowledge tends to proliferate despite attempts at secrecy. The consensus is that while some information may be classified, the fundamental laws of science cannot be permanently suppressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Manhattan Project and its implications on nuclear technology.
  • Familiarity with the concept of national security and its relationship to technological advancements.
  • Knowledge of historical examples of independent technological developments, such as calculus by Newton and Leibniz.
  • Awareness of the principles of scientific knowledge dissemination and its impact on society.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context and outcomes of the Manhattan Project.
  • Explore the implications of national security on technological innovation and information sharing.
  • Investigate case studies of independent technological advancements across different civilizations.
  • Examine the role of scientific journals and public access to potentially dangerous knowledge.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for historians, policymakers, scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology, security, and knowledge dissemination.

  • #31
Danger said:
This is a global forum. A lot of us don't give a rat's ass what the US government wants.

Careful. King the wonder dog may be sniffing your car as you speak.:wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K