TVP45
- 1,041
- 5
Danger said:This is a global forum. A lot of us don't give a rat's ass what the US government wants.
Careful. King the wonder dog may be sniffing your car as you speak.
The discussion centers on the potential for technology suppression by governments and scientific establishments, particularly regarding dangerous knowledge. Participants argue that while certain technologies can pose national security threats, the inherent nature of scientific advancement makes total suppression unlikely. Historical examples, such as the Manhattan Project and independent developments of nuclear weapons, illustrate that knowledge tends to proliferate despite attempts at secrecy. The consensus is that while some information may be classified, the fundamental laws of science cannot be permanently suppressed.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for historians, policymakers, scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology, security, and knowledge dissemination.