Change (control)the spin up or down of 1 entangled particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Quantum entanglement does not allow for faster-than-light (FTL) communication, as changing the spin of one entangled particle results in random noise for the recipient, referred to as Bob. While it is possible to manipulate the spin, effective communication requires classical means, as pre-agreed protocols must be established to convey information. The discussion emphasizes that while entangled particles have significant applications in quantum computing and cryptography, they do not enable the transmission of information beyond the speed of light, adhering to the principles of relativity and causality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum entanglement
  • Knowledge of classical communication protocols
  • Familiarity with quantum computing concepts
  • Basic principles of relativity and causality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum computing applications in cryptography
  • Learn about superdense coding and quantum state teleportation
  • Explore entanglement theory and its implications
  • Investigate sub-light speed secure communication methods
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum computing researchers, cryptographers, and anyone interested in the limitations and applications of quantum entanglement in communication.

lnsanity
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I want to know if its possible to change (control)the spin up or down of 1 entangled particle so it would be possible to transmit data throughout the universe instantly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


lnsanity said:
I want to know if its possible to change (control)the spin up or down of 1 entangled particle so it would be possible to transmit data throughout the universe instantly.

It is impossible to transmit Information FTL (Faster Than Light) using quantum Entanglment. It is poossible to change the spin, but for the recipient on the other end (call him Bob for formality) would only be able to see random noise. You need non-quantum (Classical) means of communication. You could meet before you part and agree on certain timings, etc... but then you've ALREADY communicated the information sub-c right? When you break down all of the other ideas you run into the same issue; "Spukhafte Fernwirking" certainly seems to exist, but in terms of using it to break the limits sets by Relativity and Causality are out. Sorry!

This doesn't mean Entangled partcles wouldn't be useful as means of communicating information, but you'd be doing it at or below 'c'. You should do some research into quantum computing, crptology, and sub-c secure communications. There ARE amazing properties of what you're talking about, they just happen to not break Causality.
 
Last edited:


Must consider about entanglement :


Applications of entanglement

Entanglement has many applications in quantum information theory. With the aid of entanglement, otherwise impossible tasks may be achieved. Among the best known applications of entanglement are superdense coding, quantum state teleportation, information exchanges through time, and the creation of a Quantum Computer. Efforts to quantify this resource are often termed entanglement theory.[9] [10] Quantum entanglement also has many different applications in the emerging technologies of quantum computing and quantum cryptography, and has been used to realize quantum teleportation experimentally[11]. At the same time, ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement#Applications_of_entanglement"
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Frame Dragger said:
It is impossible to transmit Information FTL (Faster Than Light) using quantum Entanglment. It is poossible to change the spin, but for the recipient on the other end (call him Bob for formality) would only be able to see random noise. You need non-quantum (Classical) means of communication. You could meet before you part and agree on certain timings, etc... but then you've ALREADY communicated the information sub-c right? When you break down all of the other ideas you run into the same issue; "Spukhafte Fernwirking" certainly seems to exist, but in terms of using it to break the limits sets by Relativity and Causality are out. Sorry!

This doesn't mean Entangled partcles wouldn't be useful as means of communicating information, but you'd be doing it at or below 'c'. You should do some research into quantum computing, crptology, and sub-c secure communications. There ARE amazing properties of what you're talking about, they just happen to not break Causality.

Why would the other only see random noise he cannot see the particle changing state ? can you clarify ? What do you mean by timing ? can you clarify that too ? a protocol is always decided in advance before transmitting a message...
 


lnsanity said:
Why would the other only see random noise he cannot see the particle changing state ? can you clarify ? What do you mean by timing ? can you clarify that too ? a protocol is always decided in advance before transmitting a message...

As I said, this is a subject that has been covered, probably dozens of times in this forum. JDo a search, and I guarantee you'll find all the answers you need.
 


Frame Dragger said:
As I said, this is a subject that has been covered, probably dozens of times in this forum. JDo a search, and I guarantee you'll find all the answers you need.

OK thank where it as been covered can you give me a link please ?
 


lnsanity said:
OK thank where it as been covered can you give me a link please ?

https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?searchid=2042777
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K