Change of variable in indefinite integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on justifying the change of variables in indefinite integrals, specifically the transformation from \(\int e^{ax}dx\) to \(\int \frac{1}{a}e^u du\). The participants reference the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, stating that if \(f\) is continuous, a primitive \(F(\beta)\) can be expressed using the change of variable theorem. The chain rule is also highlighted as a key concept, demonstrating that if \(F(x) = \int e^{ax}dx\) and \(G(u) = \frac{1}{a}\int e^u du\), then \(F\) and \(G\) are anti-derivatives of the same function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of indefinite integrals and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in variable substitution techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in detail
  • Learn about the chain rule and its applications in calculus
  • Explore advanced techniques for variable substitution in integrals
  • Review examples of indefinite integrals involving exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in mathematics or engineering who are looking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques and the justification of variable changes in indefinite integrals.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I've had this very basic question on the back of my mind for 2 almost years now and I think I've found a satisfactory answer. The question is this most simple one: how do we justify a change of variables such as

[tex]\int e^{ax}dx = \int \frac{1}{a}e^udu[/tex]

in an indefinite integral? My "solution" is this... We are looking for a primitive [itex]F(\beta)[/itex] to [itex]f(\beta)[/itex]. By one version of the fondamental thm, as soon as f is continuous, such a primitive is given by

[tex]F(\beta)=\int_{\phi(\alpha)}^{\phi(\beta)}f(x)dx = \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}(f\circ \phi)(s)\frac{d\phi}{ds}ds[/tex]

where [itex]\phi:(\alpha,\beta)\rightarrow (\phi(\alpha), \phi(\beta))[/itex] is [itex]C^1[/itex]. (Ths is just the change of variable thm)

This may be total nonsense, but my eyes are itching from tiredness so I wouldn't know. Any comments on the above or an opinion on how to justify change of variable in indefinite integrals will be warmly appreciate tomorrow morning.

Good night!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
I've had this very basic question on the back of my mind for 2 almost years now and I think I've found a satisfactory answer. The question is this most simple one: how do we justify a change of variables such as

[tex]\int e^{ax}dx = \int \frac{1}{a}e^udu[/tex]

in an indefinite integral? My "solution" is this... We are looking for a primitive [itex]F(\beta)[/itex] to [itex]f(\beta)[/itex]. By one version of the fondamental thm, as soon as f is continuous, such a primitive is given by

[tex]F(\beta)=\int_{\phi(\alpha)}^{\phi(\beta)}f(x)dx = \int_{\alpha}^{\beta}(f\circ \phi)(s)\frac{d\phi}{ds}ds[/tex]

where [itex]\phi:(\alpha,\beta)\rightarrow (\phi(\alpha), \phi(\beta))[/itex] is [itex]C^1[/itex]. (Ths is just the change of variable thm)

This may be total nonsense, but my eyes are itching from tiredness so I wouldn't know. Any comments on the above or an opinion on how to justify change of variable in indefinite integrals will be warmly appreciate tomorrow morning.

Good night!
I'm not at all sure what you are asking. Certainly if
[tex]F(x)= \int e^{ax}dx[/tex] and
[tex]G(u)= \frac{1}{a}\int e^u du[/tex]
then, by the chain rule, with u(x)= ax,
[tex]\frac{dG}{dx}= \frac{dG}{du}\frac{du}{dx}[/tex]
[tex]= \left(\frac{1}{a}e^u\right)(a)[/tex]
[tex]= e^u= e^{ax}= \frac{dF}{dx}[/tex]
Since F and G have the same derivatives they are anti-derivatives (indefinite integrals) of the same thing.

"Substitution" in integrals is just the chain rule "in reverse".
 
ack, I had tried things with the chain rule, but never this. Yep, this is exactly what I was loking for, thanks Halls!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K