Undergrad Hooke's Law: Changes for Large Displacements

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lukeblackhill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
Click For Summary
Hooke's Law applies effectively for small displacements, where the force is linearly proportional to the displacement. However, for large displacements, the relationship becomes nonlinear, necessitating the inclusion of higher-order terms in the equation. This change occurs because significant displacements alter the material's stress and strain characteristics, particularly affecting the cross-sectional area and resulting in increased stress. As a result, the force does not increase in equal steps with displacement. Ultimately, for accurate modeling of large displacements, a Taylor expansion around the equilibrium point is required to account for the nonlinear behavior.
Lukeblackhill
Messages
39
Reaction score
3
Morning,

I've come across this statement in Berkeley Physics Course, Vol.1 - Cp. 5 (pg.149):

"For sufficiently small displacements such a force may be produced by a stretched or compressed spring. For large elastic displacements we must add terms in higher powers of x to Eq. (,5.19): Fx = - Cx."

I tried to find on internet explanations about how this change in Hooke's law happens when large displacements are involved, but I couldn't find a convincing explanation. Could anyone here help me?

Cheers,
Luke.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lukeblackhill said:
I couldn't find a convincing explanation.
Here's an arm waving one. It is easier to appreciate if you are dealing with a straight wire, rather than a coiled spring but the principle can be extended (no pun intended).

The Young Modulus of a material is fundamental to the material and is given by Stress / Strain where stress is the force per unit area and strain is the proportional change in length. It is constant. When the displacement is significant, assuming that the volume of the wire doesn't change, the cross sectional area will reduce so the stress will increase. Hence the 'Force' that's used in Hooke's law does not result equal steps in Stress. Or, the other way round, although the stress may be proportional to the strain, the Force is not proportional to the extension.
The wire in your average helical (or leaf) spring doesn't change its thickness appreciably as it is extended over its normal operating range so Hooke works quite well enough.
 
Last edited:
Hooke's law is a linear relation between force and deformation. What the Berkeley folks are saying is simply that, for large enough deformations, the linear relation fails and a nonlinear relation (represented by a power series in the deformation) is required. This is essentially what Sophie said above.
 
There is some function F=g(x) that represents the force at an arbitrary displacement from equilibrium. So you can do a Taylor expansion about the equilibrium point. That will give

##g(x)=g(0)+g’(0)x+g’’(0)x^2+g’’’(0)x^3+...##

At the equilibrium point g(0)=0, by definition, so Hooke’s law is the first order expansion

##g(x)=g’(0)x+O(x^2)##

If you need higher accuracy then you just add more terms. There is actually no physics in the statement, just a little math
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
14K