Changing Orbital Angular Momentum with Added Protons

  • Thread starter Thread starter unscientific
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Proton
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of adding a proton to an atom on its orbital angular momentum and energy states. Participants explore whether the addition of a proton changes the atom's orbital angular momentum and the probability of the energy remaining unchanged.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the relationship between the old and new energy states, questioning how the electron's state is described after the addition of a proton. There are discussions about the expansion of eigenstates and the implications for energy measurements.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of energy eigenstates and the implications of measurements in the new system. Some guidance has been offered regarding the notation and the relationship between the old and new systems, but there is no explicit consensus on the probability of retaining the same energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the old system no longer exists after the addition of a proton, and there is a need to prove certain statements regarding energy eigenvalues and their relationships between the old and new systems.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



2s9rng5.png


Does adding a proton change the atom's orbital angular momentum? Find the probability that the energy is unchanged.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The orbital angular momentum is unchanged, since ##<L^2> = l(l+1)\hbar^2## is independent of Z.

To find the probability that the energy is unchanged, we overlap the old state (Z=1) with the new state (Z=2):

|\langle\psi^{Z=1}|\psi^{Z=2}\rangle

Not sure how to find this value, without using brute force integration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I want to start by checking your understanding:
The electron starts in an energy eigenstate of the old system - how would you describe it's state in the new system?

Can you express the question in terms of performing a measurement?
 
Simon Bridge said:
I want to start by checking your understanding:
The electron starts in an energy eigenstate of the old system - how would you describe it's state in the new system?

Can you express the question in terms of performing a measurement?

The Z=2 state will be a linear combination of Z=1 states?

The probability of energy being unchanged = probability of measuring old energy
 
The Z=2 state will be a linear combination of Z=1 states?
Other way around.
You can expand the Z=2 eigenstates that way but it does not help you.

The old system no longer exists - all subsequent measurements will be done in the new system.

Helps to talk about this if we define a notation... how about:
If the old state is ##\psi_{o}## corresponding to energy ##E_{o}:\text H_o\psi_o=E_o\psi_o## of the Z=1 system; and you have a complete set of orthonormal eigenvectors of the Z=2 system ##\{\psi_n\}## then you know to write ##\psi_{old}=\sum_n c_n\psi_n## where ##\text H\psi_n = E_n\psi_n##

This means that the electron is no longer in an energy eigenstate of the system - well it might be(!) - thus it's energy is uncertain until measured. Once measured, however, it will be found in an eigenstate of the new system with a specific value for energy and subsequent measurements will find the same thing - this should sound familiar to you.

Just checking:
In terms of the above expansion, what is the probability that the electron will be found with particular energy ##E_n##?
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
Other way around.
You can expand the Z=2 eigenstates that way but it does not help you.

The old system no longer exists - all subsequent measurements will be done in the new system.

Helps to talk about this if we define a notation... how about:
If the old state is ##\psi_{o}## corresponding to energy ##E_{o}:\text H_o\psi_o=E_o\psi_o## of the Z=1 system; and you have a complete set of orthonormal eigenvectors of the Z=2 system ##\{\psi_n\}## then you know to write ##\psi_{old}=\sum_n c_n\psi_n## where ##\text H\psi_n = E_n\psi_n##

This means that the electron is no longer in an energy eigenstate of the system - well it might be(!) - thus it's energy is uncertain until measured. Once measured, however, it will be found in an eigenstate of the new system with a specific value for energy and subsequent measurements will find the same thing - this should sound familiar to you.

Just checking:
In terms of the above expansion, what is the probability that the electron will be found with particular energy ##E_n##?

Yes, it is due to the phenomenon of the collapse of the wavefunction.

Probability to find electron with energy ##E_n## is ##|c_n|^2##. But none of this ##E_n## is equal to the old energy!
 
unscientific said:
Probability to find electron with energy ##E_n## is ##|c_n|^2##. But none of this ##E_n## is equal to the old energy!
So what is the probability that a subsequent measurement of energy will find the electron in a state ##\psi_n: E_n = E_{o}##?
Therefore, what is the probability that the electron keeps the same energy?

However - you will need to prove the statement "But none of this ##E_n## is equal to the old energy!".
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
So what is the probability that a subsequent measurement of energy will find the electron in a state ##\psi_n: E_n = E_{o}##?
Therefore, what is the probability that the electron keeps the same energy?

However - you will need to prove the statement "But none of this ##E_n## is equal to the old energy!".

The probability is 0, since now all the energy eigenkets are different from the old enegrgy eigenket.

Thus, it is impossible to find the atom in the old energy state.
 
The probability is 0, since now all the energy eigenkets are different from the old enegrgy eigenket.
The probability reasoning here is good, but the rest is not: two different eigenkets can have the same eigenvalue - especially if they come from different Hamiltonians.

You still need to prove that no energy eigenvalue of the new system has the same value as the old energy level.
To do that you need to express the new energy levels in terms of the old one, and solve for n: En=Eo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K