1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Changing sign of data (regression)

  1. Oct 5, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    I was trying to fit experimental data which are theoretically modeled by an exponential function. They are shown in the first graph below. For the first set (red line), the data does not appear to be exponential. My lecturer once said that I need to flip the signs of the first few data points to get an exponential (see the second plot).


    Is there any justification for doing this? Are there any situations where such a thing would be appropriate?

    This data relate to the absolute values of magnetisation in an MRI experiment.

    2. Relevant equations
    3. The attempt at a solution

    When I flipped the signs of the first six data points, I got a curve which could then be modeled with an exponential, just like the other data sets. I got R2 = 0.99971, and the time constant I calculated from this was in agreement with the expected value.

    So, why does this method work? Could there be any justification for doing this?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 5, 2016 #2
    Without knowing what your experimental setup is and what exactly is it that you are fitting to, we can't really tell with certainty. However, my suspicion is that your experimental device is only able to measure the absolute value of the quantity (or its square, since I see intensity in your graph there), which is why you have to "reverse" the sign to recover the actual value of the quantity possessed by the system.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Threads - Changing sign data Date
Sign of a function Nov 1, 2017
Estimated Instantaneous Rate Of Change Oct 18, 2016
Change of summation Aug 14, 2016
Change of origin Aug 5, 2016