Changing the Temperature in an MCNP code

AI Thread Summary
Changing dimensions and densities in MCNP does not automatically adjust cell volumes; manual updates are required for volume override cards, VOL data cards, and cell cards with VOL= specifications. Users have noted that while MCNP attempts to calculate volumes, this feature can be unreliable, particularly in older versions. Manual adjustments are necessary, especially when dealing with complex geometries. The discussion highlights the importance of careful input file management when using MCNP5. Ultimately, users should be prepared to manually verify and adjust cell volumes to ensure accuracy.
Zakariya
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Hello everybody. I would like to ask a question;
if I change the dimensions and densities and the material number identifier ZAID to a specific temperature.
Does MCNP change automatically the volume of the cells? or I have to change the volume of each cell manually and indicate it in the cell cards?
Best.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
MCNP will always attempt to calculate the volume. I've found it to be sometimes unreliable, but that was in old versions of the code and may be a quirk of the order I entered cell dimensions in, or some other rule I broke.

If you have a volume override card (explicit divisor FD) then you will need to alter that manually. If you have a VOL data card you will need to alter that manually. If you have a VOL= as part of your cell card you will need to alter that manually.

I'm assuming you are just text editing the input file. If you are using a fancy editor with a high level representation of the objects anything is possible.
 
Thanks for your reply. I am using MCNP5 version, I change the volume of each cell manually. But when things get very complecated in determinating the volume of each cell ...
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
840
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top