Charge densities and delta functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric charge density ρ(𝑟) of a point charge q at position 𝑟₀ is defined as ρ(𝑟) = qδ³(𝑟 - 𝑟₀), where δ³ represents the three-dimensional Dirac delta function. This formulation ensures that the integral of the charge density over all space equals the total charge, confirming that ρ(𝑟) is a distribution rather than a conventional function. For a dipole consisting of charges -q at the origin and +q at position 𝑟₀, the charge density is expressed as ρ(𝑟) = -qδ³(𝑟) + qδ³(𝑟 - 𝑟₀). Additionally, the charge density of a uniform infinitesimally thin spherical shell of radius R and total charge Q can be modeled as ρ(𝑟) = Cδ(𝑟 - R), where C is determined by the condition that the total charge integrates to Q.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac delta functions and distributions
  • Familiarity with electric charge density concepts
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates for integration
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Dirac delta functions in physics
  • Learn about charge distributions in electrostatics, specifically surface and volume charge densities
  • Explore the derivation of electric fields from charge densities using Gauss's Law
  • Investigate multipole expansions and their relevance in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, electrostatics, and mathematical physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to understand charge distributions and their implications in physical systems.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Note from mentor: this thread was originally posted in a non-homework forum, therefore it lacks the homework template.

I was wondering if the electric charge density ##\rho({\bf{r}})## of a point charge ##q## at position ##{\bf{r}}_{0}## is given by ##\rho({\bf{r}})=q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}}-{\bf{r}}_{0})##.

If so, is this because ##\int d^{3}{\bf{r}}\ \rho({\bf{r}}) = \int d^{3}{\bf{r}}\ q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}}-{\bf{r}}_{0}) = q##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's a point charge at rest, yes. Note that ##\delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_0)## is NOT a function BUT a distribution (generalized function)!
 
Let's say that now we have a point charge ##-q## at the origin and a point charge ##+q## at position ##\bf{r}_{0}##. Is the charge density of the dipole given by ##\rho({\bf{r}})=-q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}})+q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}-\bf{r}_{0}})##?
 
Yes, but usually a dipole is defined as the approximation that ##r_0## is very small in the sense of the multipole expansion.
 
Thanks.

I'm also trying to find the charge density of a uniform infinitesimally thin spherical shell of radius ##R## and total charge ##Q## centred at the origin.

This is my attempt:

##\int\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ dV = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (\text{sin}\theta\ d\theta\ d\phi)\ (r^{2}dr) = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (r^{2}dr) = \frac{Q}{4\pi}##

Any hints on what to do next?
 
failexam said:
Thanks.

I'm also trying to find the charge density of a uniform infinitesimally thin spherical shell of radius ##R## and total charge ##Q## centred at the origin.

This is my attempt:

##\int\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ dV = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (\text{sin}\theta\ d\theta\ d\phi)\ (r^{2}dr) = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (r^{2}dr) = \frac{Q}{4\pi}##

Any hints on what to do next?
How about assuming ρ(r) = f(r) δ(r - r0) in your last integral
because you know ρ will have to have an infinity at r0 to cancel out the dr in Q = ∫ρ(r) dV = ∫ρ(r) 4π r2 dr
then putting that in your last integral and solving for f(r0) and stating f(r) = f(r0) with r0 = r.

PS I used r0 in lieu of your R.
 
Last edited:
rude man said:
How about assuming ρ(r) = f(r) δ(r - r0) in your last integral
because you know ρ will have to have an infinity at r0 to cancel out the dr in Q = ∫ρ(r) dV = ∫ρ(r) 4π r2 dr
then putting that in your last integral and solving for f(r0) and stating f(r) = f(r0) with r0 = r.

PS I used r0 in lieu of your R.
Sorry

What is the reason for ρ should have an infinity at r?
 
garylau said:
Sorry

What is the reason for ρ should have an infinity at r?
ρ is infinite at r0.

It's because the shell of charge is modeled as having zero thickness. Since the shell contains a finite amount of charge, the density of charge must be infinite.

It's somewhat similar to a point charge. If a finite amount of charge occupies a single point, then the density of charge must be infinite.
 
TSny said:
ρ is infinite at r0.

It's because the shell of charge is modeled as having zero thickness. Since the shell contains a finite amount of charge, the density of charge must be infinite.

It's somewhat similar to a point charge. If a finite amount of charge occupies a single point, then the density of charge must be infinite.
Do you mean the volume is zero So the Q/volume=infinity?
 
  • #10
garylau said:
Do you mean the volume is zero So the Q/volume=infinity?
Yes, the volume is zero. So the volume charge density ρ is infinite. The surface charge density is finite.
 
  • Like
Likes garylau
  • #11
TSny said:
Yes, the volume is zero. So the volume charge density ρ is infinite. The surface charge density is finite.
i See thank you
 
  • #12
You are welcome. I'm glad I could help.
 
  • #13
rude man said:
How about assuming ρ(r) = f(r) δ(r - r0) in your last integral
because you know ρ will have to have an infinity at r0 to cancel out the dr in Q = ∫ρ(r) dV = ∫ρ(r) 4π r2 dr
then putting that in your last integral and solving for f(r0) and stating f(r) = f(r0) with r0 = r.

PS I used r0 in lieu of your R.

there are one more question

How to use ρ at infinity to cancel out the dr in Q??

can you explain more

thank
 
  • #14
garylau said:
there are one more question

How to use ρ at infinity to cancel out the dr in Q??

can you explain more

thank
I'm not sure I understand the question. The idea is that ρ(r) is zero everywhere except where r = R. (I'm switching the notation from r0 to R for the radius of the spherical shell in order to conform to post # 5. Sorry for the notational confusion.) At r = R, ρ is infinite.

So, assume that ρ(r) is proportional to δ(r - R): ρ(r) = Cδ(r - R).

You just need to determine C. Do this by requiring ∫ρ(r)dV = Q for integration over all space. Express the integral in spherical coordinates and work out the value of C.
 
  • Like
Likes garylau
  • #15
TSny said:
I'm not sure I understand the question. The idea is that ρ(r) is zero everywhere except where r = R. (I'm switching the notation from r0 to R for the radius of the spherical shell in order to conform to post # 5. Sorry for the notational confusion.) At r = R, ρ is infinite.

So, assume that ρ(r) is proportional to δ(r - R): ρ(r) = Cδ(r - R).

You just need to determine C. Do this by requiring ∫ρ(r)dV = Q for integration over all space. Express the integral in spherical coordinates and work out the value of C.
it look likes the C should be the surface charge density
 
  • #16
garylau said:
it look likes the C should be the surface charge density
Yes, that's right.
 
  • Like
Likes garylau
  • #17
Usually a dipole is formed as a limit as separation d->0 but with charge q/d to compensate.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
700
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K