Charge densities and delta functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric charge densities, particularly focusing on point charges and their representation using delta functions. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of charge densities for point charges and dipoles, as well as the charge density of a uniform spherical shell.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the representation of point charges using delta functions and question the implications of charge density being infinite for point-like distributions. There are attempts to derive the charge density for a spherical shell and inquiries about the relationship between charge density and surface charge density.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of charge density, with some participants suggesting specific forms for the density function. There is an ongoing exploration of how to mathematically express the charge density for different configurations, and guidance has been offered regarding the use of delta functions in these contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of charge density definitions and the implications of modeling point charges and thin shells, including the challenge of handling infinite densities in mathematical terms.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Note from mentor: this thread was originally posted in a non-homework forum, therefore it lacks the homework template.

I was wondering if the electric charge density ##\rho({\bf{r}})## of a point charge ##q## at position ##{\bf{r}}_{0}## is given by ##\rho({\bf{r}})=q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}}-{\bf{r}}_{0})##.

If so, is this because ##\int d^{3}{\bf{r}}\ \rho({\bf{r}}) = \int d^{3}{\bf{r}}\ q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}}-{\bf{r}}_{0}) = q##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's a point charge at rest, yes. Note that ##\delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_0)## is NOT a function BUT a distribution (generalized function)!
 
Let's say that now we have a point charge ##-q## at the origin and a point charge ##+q## at position ##\bf{r}_{0}##. Is the charge density of the dipole given by ##\rho({\bf{r}})=-q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}})+q\delta^{(3)}({\bf{r}-\bf{r}_{0}})##?
 
Yes, but usually a dipole is defined as the approximation that ##r_0## is very small in the sense of the multipole expansion.
 
Thanks.

I'm also trying to find the charge density of a uniform infinitesimally thin spherical shell of radius ##R## and total charge ##Q## centred at the origin.

This is my attempt:

##\int\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ dV = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (\text{sin}\theta\ d\theta\ d\phi)\ (r^{2}dr) = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (r^{2}dr) = \frac{Q}{4\pi}##

Any hints on what to do next?
 
failexam said:
Thanks.

I'm also trying to find the charge density of a uniform infinitesimally thin spherical shell of radius ##R## and total charge ##Q## centred at the origin.

This is my attempt:

##\int\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ dV = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (\text{sin}\theta\ d\theta\ d\phi)\ (r^{2}dr) = Q##

##\lim\limits_{\epsilon\to 0}\ \int\limits_{R-\epsilon}^{R+\epsilon}\ \rho({\bf{r}})\ (r^{2}dr) = \frac{Q}{4\pi}##

Any hints on what to do next?
How about assuming ρ(r) = f(r) δ(r - r0) in your last integral
because you know ρ will have to have an infinity at r0 to cancel out the dr in Q = ∫ρ(r) dV = ∫ρ(r) 4π r2 dr
then putting that in your last integral and solving for f(r0) and stating f(r) = f(r0) with r0 = r.

PS I used r0 in lieu of your R.
 
Last edited:
rude man said:
How about assuming ρ(r) = f(r) δ(r - r0) in your last integral
because you know ρ will have to have an infinity at r0 to cancel out the dr in Q = ∫ρ(r) dV = ∫ρ(r) 4π r2 dr
then putting that in your last integral and solving for f(r0) and stating f(r) = f(r0) with r0 = r.

PS I used r0 in lieu of your R.
Sorry

What is the reason for ρ should have an infinity at r?
 
garylau said:
Sorry

What is the reason for ρ should have an infinity at r?
ρ is infinite at r0.

It's because the shell of charge is modeled as having zero thickness. Since the shell contains a finite amount of charge, the density of charge must be infinite.

It's somewhat similar to a point charge. If a finite amount of charge occupies a single point, then the density of charge must be infinite.
 
TSny said:
ρ is infinite at r0.

It's because the shell of charge is modeled as having zero thickness. Since the shell contains a finite amount of charge, the density of charge must be infinite.

It's somewhat similar to a point charge. If a finite amount of charge occupies a single point, then the density of charge must be infinite.
Do you mean the volume is zero So the Q/volume=infinity?
 
  • #10
garylau said:
Do you mean the volume is zero So the Q/volume=infinity?
Yes, the volume is zero. So the volume charge density ρ is infinite. The surface charge density is finite.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: garylau
  • #11
TSny said:
Yes, the volume is zero. So the volume charge density ρ is infinite. The surface charge density is finite.
i See thank you
 
  • #12
You are welcome. I'm glad I could help.
 
  • #13
rude man said:
How about assuming ρ(r) = f(r) δ(r - r0) in your last integral
because you know ρ will have to have an infinity at r0 to cancel out the dr in Q = ∫ρ(r) dV = ∫ρ(r) 4π r2 dr
then putting that in your last integral and solving for f(r0) and stating f(r) = f(r0) with r0 = r.

PS I used r0 in lieu of your R.

there are one more question

How to use ρ at infinity to cancel out the dr in Q??

can you explain more

thank
 
  • #14
garylau said:
there are one more question

How to use ρ at infinity to cancel out the dr in Q??

can you explain more

thank
I'm not sure I understand the question. The idea is that ρ(r) is zero everywhere except where r = R. (I'm switching the notation from r0 to R for the radius of the spherical shell in order to conform to post # 5. Sorry for the notational confusion.) At r = R, ρ is infinite.

So, assume that ρ(r) is proportional to δ(r - R): ρ(r) = Cδ(r - R).

You just need to determine C. Do this by requiring ∫ρ(r)dV = Q for integration over all space. Express the integral in spherical coordinates and work out the value of C.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: garylau
  • #15
TSny said:
I'm not sure I understand the question. The idea is that ρ(r) is zero everywhere except where r = R. (I'm switching the notation from r0 to R for the radius of the spherical shell in order to conform to post # 5. Sorry for the notational confusion.) At r = R, ρ is infinite.

So, assume that ρ(r) is proportional to δ(r - R): ρ(r) = Cδ(r - R).

You just need to determine C. Do this by requiring ∫ρ(r)dV = Q for integration over all space. Express the integral in spherical coordinates and work out the value of C.
it look likes the C should be the surface charge density
 
  • #16
garylau said:
it look likes the C should be the surface charge density
Yes, that's right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: garylau
  • #17
Usually a dipole is formed as a limit as separation d->0 but with charge q/d to compensate.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K