Charge on Conductors - David J Griffiths

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter person_random_normal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Conductors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the behavior of electric charge in conductors, specifically referencing David J. Griffiths' principles. It establishes that in electrostatic conditions, any charge placed on a conductor will reside on its surface, resulting in an electric field of zero inside the conductor. The reasoning is supported by Maxwell's equations and Gauss's Law, confirming that the surface of the conductor is equipotential. The discussion clarifies that while the surface charge density may vary, the interior remains free of charge in electrostatic scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of electric fields and charge distribution
  • Concept of equipotential surfaces in conductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of electrostatics on conductor behavior
  • Explore the differences between electrostatics and magnetostatics
  • Investigate the concept of surface charge density variations
  • Learn about the applications of Gauss's Law in different geometries
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and the behavior of conductors in electric fields.

person_random_normal
Messages
165
Reaction score
10
upload_2016-4-14_23-42-59.png

- David J Griffiths

But how s it valid for some conductor like →
 
Physics news on Phys.org
upload_2016-4-14_23-49-2.png
 
Given:
1) Maxwells equations.
2) Electrostatic: ##J=0##, ##d\rho/dt=0##, ##dE/dt=0##, ##dB/dt=0##
3) Conductor: ##J=\sigma E##

Assume there is charge in the interior. Then by Gauss law there is an E field in the interior. Then by assumption 3) there is a current. This contradicts assumption 2). Therefore there can be no charge in the interior.
 
So does that mean -
if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential
 
please reply
somebody !
 
The reasoning is very simple. I don't know, why Griffiths likes to obscure things in his textbooks. In electrostatics by definition we have all fields and sources time-independent and also no current density (see #3). Then within a conductor you have
$$\sigma \vec{E}=\vec{j}=0 \; \Rightarrow \; \vec{E}=0.$$
The electric charge density at every point is given by Gauss's Law (Heaviside-Lorentz units)
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=\rho.$$
Since ##\vec{E}=0## inside the conductor also ##\rho=\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=0## inside the conductor. So if the conducting body is overall charged, the charge must be on its surface.

Caveat: To be more accurate, of course microscopically the entire body consists of charged particles (atomic nuclei and electrons). So there are charges inside the body but they are compensating each other precisely in the static case, when looked from a macroscopic (coarse-grained) point of view. So within macroscopic electrodynamics the macroscopic charge distribution vanishes in conductors for electrostatic situations.
 
so #4 is right ?
 
So does that mean -
if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential
 
vanhees71 said:
The electric charge density at every point is given by Gauss's Law (Heaviside-Lorentz units)
⃗∇⋅⃗E=ρ.​
by the way can you put this physically , I don't know this math
 
  • #10
Shreyas Samudra said:
So does that mean -
if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential
Only in the electrostatic case, yes. This does not hold in magnetostatics or electrodynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: person_random_normal
  • #11
Shreyas Samudra said:
So does that mean -
if some charge is given to an arbitrarily shaped conductor, it will surface and regardless of everything; the field inside will be zero and the surface will be equipotential
Yes. The surface is equipotential.

That does not mean that the surface charge is uniformly distributed.
 
  • #12
SammyS said:
Yes. The surface is equipotential.

That does not mean that the surface charge is uniformly distributed.

Then we should have current over the surface, as its made of conductor, does that happen in steady state ?
It won't be electrostatics then !
 
  • #13
Shreyas Samudra said:
Then we should have current over the surface, as its made of conductor, does that happen in steady state ?
It won't be electrostatics then !
I didn't mention current, nor did I imply it.

The surface charge density is not one uniform value over the whole surface. It varies from location to location, but it is static.
 
  • #14
SammyS said:
I didn't mention current, nor did I imply it.

The surface charge density is not one uniform value over the whole surface. It varies from location to location, but it is static.

that means it is equipotential
 
  • #15
Shreyas Samudra said:
that means it is equipotential
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K