How Do Potential Differences Distribute Across Series Capacitors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of potential differences across capacitors connected in series after charging from a 2600-nF capacitor initially charged to 15 V. The correct potential differences across the capacitors are V1 = 14.7 V, V2 = 8.01 V, V3 = 4.01 V, and V4 = 2.67 V. The error in the initial calculations stemmed from incorrectly summing the reciprocals of the capacitances. The final resolution involved confirming the arithmetic and understanding the distribution of charge among the capacitors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor charging and discharging principles
  • Familiarity with series and parallel capacitor configurations
  • Knowledge of the formula for charge (Q = CV)
  • Ability to perform calculations involving fractions and series capacitance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of equivalent capacitance in series and parallel configurations
  • Learn about the energy stored in capacitors and how it relates to charge and voltage
  • Explore the implications of charge conservation in capacitor networks
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple capacitors with varying capacitances
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of capacitor behavior in circuits.

Renaldo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2600-nF capacitor is disconnected from the 15-V battery and used to charge three uncharged capacitors, a 100-nF capacitor, a 200-nF capacitor, and a 300-nF capacitor, connected in series.

After charging, what is the potential difference across each of the four capacitors?


Homework Equations



Qo = CV = 3.9e-5 C

Qo = Q234C1[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] + Q234

The Attempt at a Solution



Qo = 5.33Q234

Qo = 3.9e-5 C

Q234 = 7.32e-6 C

Q1/C1 = (Qo-Q234)/C1 = [(3.9e-5 C) - (7.32e-6 C)]/2600 nF = 12.2 V

V2 = (7.32e-6 C)/100 nF = 7.32 V

V3 = (7.32e-6 C)/200 nF = 3.65 V

V4 = (7.32e-6 C)/300 nF = 2.43 V

This is incorrect, and I haven't been able to figure out what's wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In charging the others, the big capacitor loses a charge Q and drops its voltage from 15V to V.
 
I express that in this equation,

Qo = Q234C1[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] + Q234

which is derived thusly:

(Qo-Q234)/C1 = V1

Q234[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] = V234

V1 = V234

(Qo-Q234)/C1 = Q234[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)]

Qo = Q234C1[(1/100)+(1/200)+(1/300)] + Q234
 
So, you can finish this now?
 
No, I cannot.

Correct answers are:
V1 = 14.7 V
V2 = 8.01 V
V3 = 4.01 V
V4 = 2.67 V

These differ from my answers in the op.
 
Your method looks right. When I finish it I get 14.692V, 8.0137V, etc.

So it looks like you may be making an arithmetic error.
 
Yes, I figured out what I was doing wrong. instead of adding [(1/100) + (1/200) + (1/300)]
I was doing 1/600. lol. Gotta be careful. Thanks for your help.
 
NascentOxygen said:
In charging the others, the big capacitor loses a charge Q and drops its voltage from 15V to V.

So is it like this:
the previous charge of the energized capacitor is used to charge other capacitors. The previous energized charge is distributed to new charge of C1 and the equal charge of the series capacitors.
Q_{\mbox{energized C1}}=Q_{\mbox{new charge of C1}}+Q_{234}
Hence the new charge is
Q_{\mbox{energized C1}}-Q_{234}=Q_{\mbox{new charge of C1}}=V_{1}C_{1}
is my analogy correct?
forgive me for hijacking but this also came up in the exam but the difference is a capacitor is charging two parallel capacitors.

I already also solved the problem in the op
Q_234 is 8.01x10^-7Coloumb btw
 
Equilibrium said:
So is it like this:
That looks right.
 
  • #10
Renaldo said:
Yes, I figured out what I was doing wrong. instead of adding [(1/100) + (1/200) + (1/300)]
I was doing 1/600. lol. Gotta be careful. Thanks for your help.
As a check, you could consider charging one capacitor of 600/11 nF, since that's the equivalent capacitance of those 3 capacitors in series.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K