Charles Stross and Quantum Teleportation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Charles Stross's portrayal of quantum entanglement in his novel "Singularity Sky," specifically the claim that it enables instantaneous communication without violating causality. Participants express skepticism about this representation, arguing that if faster-than-light (FTL) communication were possible, it would inherently violate causality. The consensus is that a classical communication channel is essential for meaningful interaction with quantum black boxes (qbb), undermining the feasibility of Stross's claims.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum entanglement and its implications
  • Familiarity with the concept of causality in physics
  • Knowledge of faster-than-light (FTL) communication theories
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics and quantum black boxes (qbb)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of quantum entanglement and its limitations
  • Explore the implications of causality in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate current theories on faster-than-light communication
  • Study the role of classical communication channels in quantum information theory
USEFUL FOR

Science fiction enthusiasts, physicists, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and communication technologies.

CJames
Messages
367
Reaction score
1
I'm reading Singularity Sky and came across something that didn't sound right. Charles Stross is supposed to be known for accuracy in his sci-fi. But in this novel he claims quantum entanglement can be used for instantaneous communication. Here's the claim:

"A slower-than-light freighter had spent nearly a hundred years hauling the quantum black box at the core of the casual channel ... a twin to it had spent eighty years in the hold of a sister ship, en route to Earth. Now they provided an instantaneous communications channel from one planet to the other; instantaneous in terms of special relativity, but not capable of violating causality, and with a total capacity limited to the number of qubits they had been created with."

The only thing that makes me think he's not completely talking out his butt is the claim that it's not causality violating, but I'm not sure how that's possible. I would be disappointed to see psuedo-science in a Stross novel because I love his books, but that's what it looks like to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CJames said:
The only thing that makes me think he's not completely talking out his butt is the claim that it's not causality violating
That's a cop out. If FTL communication is possible, then causality has been violated. There is nothing one can do with one's quantum black box (qbb) that would tell them with is happening with the other qbb, therefore it cannot be used to communicate. A classical communication channel is always necessary to do something meaningful with the qbb.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K