Checking a Linear Algebra result

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on identifying the possible echelon forms of a nonzero 3x2 matrix in linear algebra. Participants analyze various matrix configurations using symbols \diamond for nonzero entries, * for any value, and 0 for zero entries. They conclude that valid echelon forms must have leading entries strictly to the right of the leading entries in the rows above them. Additionally, an all-zero matrix is confirmed to be in echelon form, although it does not meet the problem's requirement for nonzero matrices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of echelon form in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with matrix notation and symbols
  • Basic knowledge of linear transformations
  • Concept of leading entries in matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of echelon forms in matrices
  • Learn about reduced row echelon form (RREF)
  • Explore the implications of leading entries in linear transformations
  • Investigate the role of zero rows in matrix echelon forms
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, particularly those seeking to understand matrix echelon forms and their applications in solving linear equations.

Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement


Yeah, so I'm just starting LinAlg, and I wanted to check my answer on a certain question. The question reads:

"Describe the possible echelon forms of a nonzero 3x2 matrix. Use the symbols \diamond, *, and 0, as in the first part of example 1."

Now, here, the \diamond indicates a nonzero entry, the * indicates an entry that can be any value, and the 0 indicates, well, a zero entry.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I got four matrices:

\left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \diamond &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right]

\left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \diamond &amp; * \\<br /> 0 &amp; \diamond \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right]

\left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \diamond &amp; * \\<br /> 0 &amp; * \\<br /> 0 &amp; \diamond \\<br /> \end{array} \right]

\left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \diamond &amp; * \\<br /> 0 &amp; * \\<br /> 0 &amp; * \\<br /> \end{array} \right]

However, I feel like I'm missing some. Can you help me with which ones?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In echelon form, the leading entry in a row has to be strictly to the right of the leading entry of the row above it, so your third and fourth matrices wouldn't generally be in echelon form.

Another case you might consider is when the first column has no leading entry.
 
Do you mean that the next leading entry can't be two rows down from the previous one? I... didn't honestly remember that.

And I'll take a look at the cases of "no leading entry in the first row". Thanks, I knew I had forgotten something.
 
No, it's more that you can't have two rows where the first non-zero element is in the same column. The matrix

\begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 2 \\ 0 &amp; 3 \end{bmatrix}

is not in echelon form though the matrix would qualify as your fourth type.
 
So, I have this as my answer now:

\left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \diamond &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right]

\left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \diamond &amp; * \\<br /> 0 &amp; \diamond \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right]

\left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; \diamond \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right]

I do wonder though, is an all-zero matrix in echelon form?
 
Looks good.

An all-zero matrix is in echelon form. It satisfies all the requirements. There are no leading entries, so there's nothing to worry about there. And all the zero rows are at the bottom.
 
I'd better add it then. Thanks for the help.
 
The problem specified non-zero matrices, so you don't need the 0 matrix.
 
Oh, of course. How foolish of me.

I guess I need to read the problem more carefully...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K