Checking for integrability on a half-open interval

Click For Summary
For a bounded, continuous, and monotonic function on a half-open interval (a,b], the function is Darboux integrable. The key is to use the definition of Darboux integrability, which states that for every ε > 0, a partition P can be found such that the difference between the upper and lower sums, U(f,P) - L(f,P), is less than ε. The contribution from the first subinterval can be controlled and made arbitrarily small by choosing an appropriate partition. Additionally, since the function is continuous on the closed interval [a + δ, b], it can be shown that the integrability condition holds. Thus, the approach involves extending the argument from closed intervals to the half-open case effectively.
schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
For a bounded, continuous and monotonous function on a half-open interval ##(a,b]##, how does one check if the function is integrable? (specifically Darboux integrable)
Relevant Equations
My definition of Darboux integrable: ##U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\epsilon## for all ##\epsilon>0##
For a closed interval ##[a,b]## I have learned that ##U(f,P)-L(f,P)=\frac{(f(b)-f(a))\cdot(b-a)}{N}## where ##N## is the number of subintervals of ##[a,b]## (if ##f## is monotonically decreasing, change the numerator of the fraction to ##f(a)-f(b)##). However, if the interval is half-open, then ##f(a)## is no longer defined. How does one go about this issue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you mean monotonic, not monotonous, though a dubious case can be made for synonimity.
 
More seriously, I assume you have been presented with a definition of the integral for cases other than monotonic. Try working from that definition.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I mean monotone of course. The only definition of Darboux integrability I’ve been given is the epsilon one above, although this can be written somewhat differently. And when I check the integrability for a certain bounded, continues and monotone function on a closed interval I make use of the fact that the difference between the upper and lower Riemann sums create a column of height ##f(b)-f(a)## and width ##(b-a)/N##. Then finding an ##N## for all ##\epsilon>0## is quite easy.
 
Just think about how to extend the argument slightly. You have monotonicity and continuity given.
 
Could one write ##\lim\limits_{x \to a^+}f(x)## instead of ##f(a)##? Is this limit evaluable?
 
schniefen said:
Problem Statement: For a bounded, continuous and monotonous function on a half-open interval ##(a,b]##, how does one check if the function is integrable? (specifically Darboux integrable)
Relevant Equations: My definition of Darboux integrable: ##U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\epsilon## for all ##\epsilon>0##

For a closed interval ##[a,b]## I have learned that ##U(f,P)-L(f,P)=\frac{(f(b)-f(a))\cdot(b-a)}{N}## where ##N## is the number of subintervals of ##[a,b]## (if ##f## is monotonically decreasing, change the numerator of the fraction to ##f(a)-f(b)##). However, if the interval is half-open, then ##f(a)## is no longer defined. How does one go about this issue?

Don't use that formula: it assumes a closed interval and is therefore not appropriate to a half-open interval.

In fact, f will be Darboux integrable on (a, b] because it is bounded and continuous; it is not necessary that it be monotonic (for example, \sin (x^{-1}) is integrable on (0,1]).

The starting point is the definition of Darboux integrability:

A function f : (a,b] \to \mathbb{R} is integrable if and only if for every \epsilon &gt; 0 there exists a partition P such that U(f,P) - L(f,P) &lt; \epsilon.

The key observation is that as f is bounded the contribution to U(f,P) - L(f,P) from the first subinterval is bounded above by K\delta where \delta is the width of the subinterval and K \geq 0 does not depend on the choice of partition. This can be made arbitrarily small by suitable choice of \delta. As f is continuous and thus integrable on the closed bounded interval [a + \delta, b], the contribution to U(f,P) - L(f,P) from [a + \delta, b] can be made arbitrarily small by suitable choice of subintervals.
 
  • Like
Likes schniefen
pasmith said:
The key observation is that as f is bounded the contribution to U(f,P) - L(f,P) from the first subinterval is bounded above by K\delta where \delta is the width of the subinterval and K \geq 0 does not depend on the choice of partition. This can be made arbitrarily small by suitable choice of \delta. As f is continuous and thus integrable on the closed bounded interval [a + \delta, b], the contribution to U(f,P) - L(f,P) from [a + \delta, b] can be made arbitrarily small by suitable choice of subintervals.
What is ##K##? If one were to prove that a piece-wise continuous function is integrable, say ##f(x)=\tan{(x)}## on ##[0,\pi/3)## and ##f(x)=\sin{(x)}## on ##(\pi/3,\pi]##, does one simply show that we can treat both intervals as closed intervals?
 
What does bounded mean? That should give you a clue to what K might be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K