MHB Checking if an interval value satisfies an expression

Siron
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Suppose a quartic polynomial with real roots where all its roots lie in the interval
$$x \in \left[\frac{5}{8}a-\frac{3}{8}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}, \frac{5}{8}a+\frac{3}{8}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}\right]$$
where $a \in \mathbb{R}$ and $b<(15/16)a^2$. Is there a way to check that at least one of those roots satisfies the inequality:
$$\frac{5ax-4x^2-b}{15ax-20x^2-3b}<0.$$

I solved the above inequality with wolfram alpha which displays the following solutions (after summarizing cases and taking $b<(15/16)a^2$ into account):
$$x \in \left[\frac{5a}{8}-\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{25a^2-16b}, \frac{3a}{8}-\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{\frac{3}{5}}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}\right]$$
or
$$x \in \left[\frac{3a}{8}+\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{\frac{3}{5}}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}, \frac{5a}{8}+\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{25a^2-16b} \right].$$

So ... in fact I think I only need to check wether the interval for my roots lies in one of the above intervals. However, I think this will result in too strong restrains on $b$. Is there a better alternative to solve the question?

Many thanks!
Kind regards,
Siron
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I now see that my question is not that clear so I will give more details. The quartic polynomial which I refer to in my previous post is given by:
$$f(x) = 16x^4-40ax^3+(15a^2+24b)x^2-18abx+3b^2$$
where $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$. If the discriminant is positive and $b<(15/16)a^2$ then the quartic has four real roots (it's not difficult to derive that). So I'm wondering if its possible to prove that at least one of these real roots satisfies the inequality:
$$\frac{5ax-4x^2-b}{15ax-20x^2-3b}<0.$$
or equivalently lies in one of the two intervals:
$$x \in \left[\frac{5a}{8}-\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{25a^2-16b}, \frac{3a}{8}-\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{\frac{3}{5}}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}\right] := [l_1,r_1] $$
or
$$x \in \left[\frac{3a}{8}+\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{\frac{3}{5}}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}, \frac{5a}{8}+\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{25a^2-16b} \right] := [l_2,r_2].$$

I first thought about the intermediate value theorem and was thinking if I maybe could force $f(l_1)<0$ and $f(r_1)>0$ (or $f(l_2)<0$ and $f(r_2)>0$). However this gives very complicated expressions. Next, I tried to use the Samuelson-Laguerre inequality. Basically, this inequality implies an interval for the roots of the quartic. Applying the inequality, the four real roots of the quartic have to lie in the interval:
$$x \in \left[\frac{5}{8}a-\frac{3}{8}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}, \frac{5}{8}a+\frac{3}{8}\sqrt{15a^2-16b}\right]$$
and this was in fact my question/idea of the first post. Maybe I can force conditions such that the above interval lies within $[l_1,r_1]$ or $[l_2,r_2]$ but this gives very strong constraints on $b$.

Therefore, I'm wondering if there is another more efficient idea/method ... ?

Thanks!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K