Checking my reasoning on deriving fine sructure constant alpha

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the fine structure constant α from Bohr's model of the hydrogen atom, specifically focusing on the ratio of the electron velocity in the ground state to the speed of light. Participants are exploring the relationships between fundamental physical constants such as h, m, and c.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting kinetic energy equal to the Coulomb force and derive expressions for velocity and radius. There are attempts to simplify the expression for α and questions about the dependence on quantum number n and radius r.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the derivation process, suggesting that the dependence on n should be clarified. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables involved, with some participants questioning the necessity of certain steps in the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the hydrogen atom being in the ground state (n=1) are discussed, and there is mention of the potential confusion regarding the need for the Bohr radius in the derivation.

Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



From Bohr’s model of hydrogen atom, derive the ratio of the electron velocity in the ground state of hydrogen atom to the speed of light, which is the fine structure constant α, in terms of fundamental physical constants such as h, m, and c.


Homework Equations



Kinetic energy in a Bohr atom: \frac{Ze^2}{r^2}
kinetic energy of a body revolving around a center: \frac{mv^2}{r}
momentum of a body revolving around a center: L=mvr


The Attempt at a Solution



So we set the kinetic energy equal to that of the Bohr atom (based on the Coulomb force)

\frac{mv^2}{r}=\frac{Ze^2}{r^2}

Since we are dealing with hyrogen Z=1, so \frac{mv^2}{r}=\frac{e^2}{r^2} and r=\frac{e^2}{mv^2}

Bohr's model says the angular momentum around a hydrogen atom is \frac{nh}{2\pi}=n\hbar

The total energy of the atom is T+U = E_T

and angular momentum can be expressed: mvr = \frac{nh}{2\pi}
so v = \frac{nh}{2\pi m r} which we can substitute into the equation for r and get

r = \frac{e^2}{m(\frac{n h}{2\pi mr})^2}=\frac{4\pi^2 e^2 m r^2}{n^2 h^2} which yields r = \frac{n^2 h^2}{4\pi^2 e^2 m}

That's the Bohr radius. We can plug that into the original relation we had for kinetic energy.

\frac{mv^2}{r}=\frac{Ze^2}{r^2}

which gets us

\frac{n^2 h^2}{4\pi^2 e^2 m r^2}=\frac{e^2}{mv^2}

and moving it all around algebraically

v^2 = \frac{e^2 4\pi^2 e^2 m r^2}{n^2 h^2 m}

v = \frac{e^2 2\pi r}{n h} and we divide that by c to get α.

So my question is if I did this correctly. (I sense that someone will tell me I did something wrong, but I want to see if its conceptual or arithmetical mistake)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Emspak said:
v = \frac{e^2 2\pi r}{n h} and we divide that by c to get α.
It won't be a fundamental physical constant if it depends on ##r## and ##n##.
 
OK, but since it is hydrogen (n=1) if I plug the expression for r into the one I got for v:

v=\frac{e^2 2 \pi}{n h} \frac{n^2 h^2}{4 \pi^2 e^2 m} = \frac{n h}{2 \pi m}

so that \alpha = \frac{n h}{2 \pi m c } and since n=1

\alpha = \frac{h}{2 \pi m c } = \frac {\hbar}{mc}

is that correct? (I figure n had to be 1 since we are talking about hydrogen and a ground state)
 
Emspak said:
\alpha = \frac{h}{2 \pi m c } = \frac {\hbar}{mc}

is that correct?
No. You made a mistake somewhere. Start from
Emspak said:
v = \frac{nh}{2\pi m r}
and substitute in the value of ##r## you got.
 
OK, doing that,

v=\frac{nh}{2\pi m r}

and

r=\frac{n^2 h^2}{4\pi^2 e^2 m}

So putting them together

v=\frac{nh}{2 \pi m } \frac{4 \pi^2 e^2 m}{n^2 h^2} = \frac{2 \pi e^2}{n h}

which would mean that

\frac{v}{c} = \frac{2 \pi e^2}{n h c} = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c} = \alpha

yes? assuming i got it righ this time I didn't need to do the second set of steps in my original derivation, I could have gone from when I got v originally rather than needing to go all the way to r.

(also, it's ok to assume n=1, right? We are talking about H).
 
Emspak said:
\frac{v}{c} = \frac{2 \pi e^2}{n h c} = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c} = \alpha
Correct, although you should get rid of the ##n## before getting to this point (or at least mention why it disappeared here).

Emspak said:
assuming i got it righ this time I didn't need to do the second set of steps in my original derivation, I could have gone from when I got v originally rather than needing to go all the way to r.
Indeed, I don't know why you did that! Your reasoning should go like this: You find an equation for ##v##, which has a dependence on ##r##. You then try to resolve this, and fortunately you have another equality which involves ##r##. You solve that one, substitute ##r## in your equation for ##v##, and see what you get. In this case, the job is then done!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yes, I think I got too hung up on needing the Bohr radius itself, which isn't necessary for this particular problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
834
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K