Checking the linear independence of elements of 2 X 2 matrices

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the linear independence of elements in 2x2 matrices, specifically matrices A, B, and C represented as |1>, |2>, and |3>. The conclusion is that |3> is a linear combination of |1> and |2>, indicating they are not linearly independent. The method to find coefficients a and b involves solving the equation |3> = a|1> + b|2>. An overdetermined system arises when there are more equations than variables, which can be addressed using techniques like Gauss-Seidel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly linear independence
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and representations
  • Knowledge of solving systems of linear equations
  • Experience with Gauss-Seidel method for solving overdetermined systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Learn how to solve systems of linear equations using the Gauss-Seidel method
  • Explore matrix representation of linear transformations
  • Investigate the implications of overdetermined systems in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in solving systems of equations or analyzing matrix properties.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2018-8-13_19-51-53.png


Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
## |3 \rangle = |1 \rangle - 2 ~ |2 \rangle ##
So, they are not linearly independent.

One way to find the coefficients is :
## |3 \rangle = a~ |1 \rangle +b~ |2 \rangle ## ...(1)
And solve (1) to get the values of a and b.

Is there any other easier way?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-13_19-51-53.png
    upload_2018-8-13_19-51-53.png
    15.8 KB · Views: 1,026
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
One way to find the coefficients is :
## |3 \rangle = a~ |1 \rangle +b~ |2 \rangle ## ...(1)
And solve (1) to get the values of a and b.

Is there any other easier way?
It doesn't get much easier than that. Since ##a## and ##b## are overdetermined, you can choose two elements from each matrix (the right column from each, for example) and solve the reduced problem

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1\\0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a\\b \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -1\\-2 \end{bmatrix}##

and then check the resulting ##a## and ##b## on the left columns.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
Pushoam said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 229238

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
## |3 \rangle = |1 \rangle - 2 ~ |2 \rangle ##
So, they are not linearly independent.

One way to find the coefficients is :
## |3 \rangle = a~ |1 \rangle +b~ |2 \rangle ## ...(1)
And solve (1) to get the values of a and b.

Is there any other easier way?
I think you have done things the easiest way -- by inspection.

Another way is to use the definition of linear independence. The matrices A, B, and C (which you are calling |1>, |2>, and |3>) are linearly independent if there is only the nontrivial solution for the constants in the equation ##c_1A + c_2B + c_3C = 0##. By nontrivial, I mean solutions other than ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
tnich said:
It doesn't get much easier than that. Since ##a## and ##b## are overdetermined, you can choose two elements from each matrix (the right column from each, for example) and solve the reduced problem

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1\\0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a\\b \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -1\\-2 \end{bmatrix}##and then check the resulting ##a## and ##b## on the left columns.
I did not understand what you meant by "##a## and ##b## are overdetermined". When to use this concept in general?
 
Pushoam said:
I did not understand what you meant by "##a## and ##b## are overdetermined". When to use this concept in general?
An overdetermined problem is one in which you have more equations than variables. In this particular case you have four linear equations to solve for two variables.
##0a+b=-2\\a+b=-1\\0a+0b=0\\0a+b=-2##
or
##\begin{bmatrix}0 &1\\1&1\\0&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end {bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}-2\\-1\\0\\-2\end{bmatrix}##

In general such a system of equations can have no solutions, one solution, or an infinite number of solutions. There are no solutions if and only if the vectors are independent. You can use Gauss-Seidel to determine this. Or you can try to find a set of linearly independent rows (easy in this case) in the leftmost matrix, remove the other rows (on both sides), and solve the reduced problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
tnich said:
An overdetermined problem is one in which you have more equations than variables. In this particular case you have four linear equations to solve for two variables.
##0a+b=-2\\a+b=-1\\0a+0b=0\\0a+b=-2##
or
##\begin{bmatrix}0 &1\\1&1\\0&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end {bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}-2\\-1\\0\\-2\end{bmatrix}##

In general such a system of equations can have no solutions, one solution, or an infinite number of solutions. There are no solutions if and only if the vectors are independent. You can use Gauss-Seidel to determine this. Or you can try to find a set of linearly independent rows (easy in this case) in the leftmost matrix, remove the other rows (on both sides), and solve the reduced problem.
It is pretty easy in this case. The first equation says that ##0 a + b = -2##, so ##b = -2.## The second equation says that ##a+b = - 1\: \Rightarrow a = -1 - b = -1 + 2 = 1.## Now check if these values of ##a## and ##b## satisfy the third and fourth equations.
 
Mark44 said:
I think you have done things the easiest way -- by inspection.

Another way is to use the definition of linear independence. The matrices A, B, and C (which you are calling |1>, |2>, and |3>) are linearly independent if there are nontrivial solutions for the constants in the equation ##c_1A + c_2B + c_3C = 0##. By nontrivial, I mean solutions other than ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0##.
I think you probably wanted to write "linearly dependent " instead of "linearly independent".
 
Pushoam said:
I think you probably wanted to write "linearly dependent " instead of "linearly independent".
Yes, I did. I'll fix my original post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K