Chemical Kinetics: velocity and equilibrium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical representation of reaction velocity and equilibrium in chemical kinetics. The velocity of a reaction is defined as ##R = R_{right} - R_{left}##, and it adjusts as the system approaches equilibrium with the equation ##R = R_{right}(1 - \frac{K}{K_{eq}})##. A participant questions the dimensional accuracy of a first-order reaction equation presented in a textbook, suggesting that the correct formulation should be ##R = k(C_A - \frac{C_B}{K_{eq}})##. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise definitions and dimensional consistency in kinetic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical reaction dynamics
  • Familiarity with first-order reaction kinetics
  • Knowledge of equilibrium constants and their significance
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical equations in chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the first-order rate law in chemical kinetics
  • Research the implications of equilibrium constants in reaction dynamics
  • Examine dimensional analysis in chemical equations for accuracy
  • Explore advanced topics in reaction mechanisms and their mathematical representations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals in chemical engineering or research who are focused on understanding reaction kinetics and equilibrium principles.

dRic2
Hi everybody,

Given a generic reaction ## Reagents ↔ Products ## the velocity of the reaction is ##R = R_{right} - R_{left} ##

To take in account that the velocity of the reaction will slow if approaching the equilibrium we say that
$$ R = R_{right}(1 - \frac K K_{eq}) $$
Although it seems reasonable it appears to me too much "arbitrary" so I don't get it very much. I mean, I could have elaborated an other relation to take the equilibrium into account or is it the only one?

Second question: A book of mine says that I reaction of first order such as ## A → B ## has
$$ R = kC_A(1- \frac K K_{eq} C_B) $$
but it seems wrong to me... Wouldn't it be
$$R = R_{right} - R_{left} = R_{right}(1 - \frac K K_{eq}) = kC_A(1- \frac K K_{eq} ) $$ ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Your book equation looks wrong dimensionally. Check their definition of the various k's.
Can you define the terms you use? Given those definitions, can you use the 1st order rate law to derive your expression for the velocity?
 
mjc123 said:
Your book equation looks wrong dimensionally. Check their definition of the various k's.
Can you define the terms you use? Given those definitions, can you use the 1st order rate law to derive your expression for the velocity?

Which one are you referring to? because ##R=R_{right}(1− \frac K K_{eq})## has to be true. Anyway:
##C_i## is the concentration of the species i (i.e. [mol/L]
##k## is kinetic constant (i.e ## R = k*C_i##) (it's dimension has to agree with
##C_i##
##K_{eq}## is the constant of equilibrium ##K_{eq} = exp(-\frac {ΔG_{R}} {RT})## (dimensionless)
while ##K = ∏a^{v_i}## (which is equal to ##K_{eq}## when the equilibrium is reached) (dimensionless)

Regarding the second equation, I didn't notice it. I'll ask my professor, thank you
 
Edit: Problem solved. And the second formula (corrected) is: ##R = R_{right} - R_{left} = k(C_A - \frac {C_B} {K_{eq}} )##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
793
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K