Chemical Kintetics - Sequential reactions

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Chemical Kinetics - Sequential reactions

Homework Statement


For a reaction ##A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C##, ##t_{1/2}## for A and B are 4 and 2 minutes respectively. How much time would be required for the B to reach maximum concentration.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I can't form the differential rate equations until I know the order of the reaction or am I missing something?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
It's implied that the half-lives are constant. First-order reactions are the only ones with half-lives that remain constant as the reaction progresses (or, equivalently, have half-lives that are independent of the reactant concentration).

Once you know it's first order, it should be easy to set up the d.e.s. If you need more help you can search under my username for "sequential decay", where I helped someone else solve a sequential radioactive decay problem years ago. Same principle.
 
Curious3141 said:
It's implied that the half-lives are constant. First-order reactions are the only ones with half-lives that remain constant as the reaction progresses (or, equivalently, have half-lives that are independent of the reactant concentration).

Thanks, missed it. :)

Setting up the D.Es
[tex]-\frac{dA}{dt}=k_1A[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dB}{dt}=k_1A-k_2B[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dC}{dt}=k_2B[/tex]

At maximum concentration of B, ##dB/dt=0##, that gives ##k_1/k_2=B/A##. I don't see how to proceed from here.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Thanks, missed it. :)

Setting up the D.Es
[tex]-\frac{dA}{dt}=k_1A[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dB}{dt}=k_1A-k_2B[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dC}{dt}=k_2B[/tex]

At maximum concentration of B, ##dB/dt=0##, that gives ##k_1/k_2=B/A##. I don't see how to proceed from here.

That's why this simple approach is a nonstarter. Did you take my suggestion and look up my earlier post? Search for "sequential decay" under my username.
 
[tex]A=A_0e^{-k_1t}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dB}{dt}+k_2B=k_1A_0e^{-k_1t}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d(e^{k_2t}B)}{dt}=k_1A_0e^{(k_2-k_1)t}[/tex]
[tex]e^{k_2t}B=\frac{k_1A_0}{(k_2-k_1)}(e^{(k_2-k_1)t}-1)[/tex]
[tex]B=\frac{k_1A_0}{(k_2-k_1)}(e^{-k_1t}-e^{-k_2t})[/tex]
B is maximum when [tex]e^{(k_2-k_1)t}=\frac{k_2}{k_1}[/tex]
or when
[tex]t=\frac{\ln{k_2}-\ln{k_1}}{k_2-k_1}[/tex]
 
Curious3141 said:
That's why this simple approach is a nonstarter. Did you take my suggestion and look up my earlier post? Search for "sequential decay" under my username.

Thanks Curious. I found out the concentration of A as a function of time and then formed a linear differential equation to find the concentration of B. :smile:

Chestermiller said:
[tex]A=A_0e^{-k_1t}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dB}{dt}+k_2B=k_1A_0e^{-k_1t}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d(e^{k_2t}B)}{dt}=k_1A_0e^{(k_2-k_1)t}[/tex]
[tex]e^{k_2t}B=\frac{k_1A_0}{(k_2-k_1)}(e^{(k_2-k_1)t}-1)[/tex]
[tex]B=\frac{k_1A_0}{(k_2-k_1)}(e^{-k_1t}-e^{-k_2t})[/tex]
B is maximum when [tex]e^{(k_2-k_1)t}=\frac{k_2}{k_1}[/tex]
or when
[tex]t=\frac{\ln{k_2}-\ln{k_1}}{k_2-k_1}[/tex]

Thank you Chet! That helped me to check my working. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K