Chernoble article on As It Happens

  • Thread starter Thread starter eugenet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of constructing a clay mountain, approximately 200 to 300 meters high, to encase the Chernobyl disaster site as a cost-effective alternative to the estimated 1.3 billion euros for current containment solutions. Participants question the necessity of a lead membrane for effective containment and explore unconventional ideas such as transforming the site into a tourist attraction with features like a ski hill and water skiing lake. The consensus emphasizes that any material used for encasement must ensure long-term stability and prevent environmental contamination, indicating that clay may not be suitable for this purpose.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear containment strategies
  • Knowledge of material science related to environmental safety
  • Familiarity with the Chernobyl disaster and its historical context
  • Basic principles of civil engineering and construction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced materials for nuclear containment, such as lead and concrete composites
  • Explore the long-term environmental impacts of containment strategies in nuclear disaster sites
  • Investigate successful case studies of similar containment projects
  • Learn about the economic implications of large-scale environmental remediation projects
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for environmental scientists, civil engineers, policymakers, and anyone involved in nuclear safety and disaster management.

eugenet
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
regarding the encasement problem of Chernoble disaster site is it feasible to build a mountain of clay, maybe 2 or 300m high, to enclose the site?
Moving 20,000,000m3 would be a lot cheaper than 1,3B euros.
Would a lead membrane be required?
I am not a scientist if my questions seem simplistic.
What about a ski-hill and water skiing lake? A tourist attraction yet!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
http://www.chernobyl-international.com/chernobyl-sarcophagus.html

This is the current state and future plans of Chernobyl and her "sarcophagus."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not a simple case of just enclosing the site with any material. Whatever they use needs to last a long time and not let things leak out and get into the environment. I don't believe dirt or clay would come close to fitting this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K