Chimney climber, Newton's lawquestion

  • Thread starter Thread starter hemetite
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a climber in a chimney, focusing on the application of Newton's laws and friction forces. The climber's weight and the static coefficients of friction between his shoes and the wall, and his back and the wall, are central to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the forces exerted by the climber's feet and back against the wall, questioning the assumption that each frictional force must equal the climber's weight. There is discussion about dividing the weight between the two friction forces and how they relate to the total upward force required to prevent falling.

Discussion Status

The conversation has progressed with some participants suggesting a reevaluation of how the forces are balanced. There is acknowledgment of the need to analyze the horizontal forces acting on the climber, and a new approach to calculating the exertion force has been proposed, which some participants find acceptable.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the walls are vertical and that the friction forces are at maximum. There is an ongoing examination of the implications of these assumptions on the calculations being discussed.

hemetite
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi, i just need to see whether my answer is logically correct?

A 70kg climber is supported in the chimney by the friction forces exerted on his shoes and back. The static coefficients of frictions between his shoes and the wall, and between his back and the wall, are 0.80 and 0.60 respectively. What is the minimum force he must exert? Assume the walls are vertical and that friction forces are both at maximum...

Here is my answer.

For the climber to remain in contact with the wall.

Both Frictional Force(shoe) and Frictinal Force(back) = mg = 70*9.81

else he will fall...

Fn1= the force he must exert by his shoe
Fn2= the force he must exert by his back

therefore

Frictional Force(shoe)= 0.80 * Fn1

mg=0.80*Fn1

Fn1(shoe)=853.4N

Frictional Force(back) = 0.60* Fn2
mg=0.6*Fn2
Fn2(back)=1144.5N.

Therefore minimum normal force he must exert to satisfy both...= 1144.5N

Logical and correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why must he support his total weight with his feet and support his total weight with his back? Do you see where Newton's Law comes in? The force he exerts on the walls of the chimney with his feet and back are equal.
 
I knew both force need to be equal

you are saying that i should dived the mg into 2...

50% load handle by the shoe

50% load handle by his back..?
 
hemetite said:
For the climber to remain in contact with the wall.

Both Frictional Force(shoe) and Frictinal Force(back) = mg = 70*9.81
No. As Halls' already explained, don't set each individual friction force equal to the weight. Instead, the total upward force must equal his weight.
else he will fall...

Fn1= the force he must exert by his shoe
Fn2= the force he must exert by his back
How are these forces related? Hint: Analyze the horizontal forces acting on the climber.
hemetite said:
I knew both force need to be equal

you are saying that i should dived the mg into 2...

50% load handle by the shoe

50% load handle by his back..?
No. Don't make any assumptions about the friction forces being equal.
 
Okay..then it should be like this

Fn=exertion force

0.80*Fn + 0.6*Fn = mg

Fn = (70*9.81) / (0.80+0.60) = 686.7 / 1.4 = 490.5N

correct?
 
Looks good.
 
thanks.. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
20K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K