Cholera Vaccines Being Tried Out

  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Vaccines
In summary, Cholera is a deadly disease caused by a bacteria that is spread through contaminated drinking water. Vaccines have been developed and are being used in outbreaks and for preventative measures, but they are not as effective as vaccines against viruses. Other methods, such as hand-washing and improved sanitation, are also important in controlling the spread of cholera. While there is a newly approved vaccine that is more effective, it is expensive and primarily used for travelers. Overall, reducing the spread of cholera relies on providing clean drinking water and addressing issues of sanitation and hygiene.
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,471
9,556
Cholera is one of the biggest killers of people. One of the Horseman of the Apocalypse (pestilence).
It causes extreme diarrhea which can cause death from dehydration.
It is spread through drinking water contaminated with human waste.

Vaccines are now being tested in real non-lab situations.
Vaccine numbers had been built up and are being used to immunize where outbreaks are occurring (the vaccines seem to more rapidly increase immunity than was initially expected) and being contemplated for use in more prophylactic situations.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Vaccines against cholera have been around for over a century, oral vaccines for over two decades.

Anything that can reduce the spread of a cholera outbreak is important. Vaccinations often work well against viruses, but not so well against bacteria where they typically prevent only about half of the expected infections.

Medical carers cannot rely on vaccination against a bacterial threat in their workplace. Hand-washing and other hygienic practices are essential.

There is no question that the availability of clean drinking water must be the primary aim. That will reduce the incidence of many viral and bacterial infections, including dysentery, cholera and typhoid.

A good way to protect the population of a first world country is to always have a stock of vaccines for diseases that may be imported by airline passengers entering the country. Hopefully the stock will not be needed. Any government owned stockpile of vaccine must be replaced on a continuous basis by the pharmaceutical industry.

The best way to protect a first world country is to circulate the stock early and donate the replaced stock through an international organisation such as the UN, to where it can be used to reduce the pool of endemic disease that threatens the first world.
 
  • #3
Personally, I would use Bacteriophages to kill bacteria as efficient killers of them that self-reproduce from the killing process of the bacteria, but barring that Baluncore is correct anything that can stop the spread of a disease is good.

wpid-virulentphagelifecycle1335388305433.png
 

Attachments

  • lytic_cycle.jpg
    lytic_cycle.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 533
  • wpid-virulentphagelifecycle1335388305433.png
    wpid-virulentphagelifecycle1335388305433.png
    66 KB · Views: 635
Last edited:
  • #4
The problem with using phages to control disease in humans is that our own immune system rapidly clears them and the antibodies created are long lasting. As we are exposed to all sorts of phages on a continuous basis it is likely that we already have antibodies against many of them. Russia seems to have the largest repository of known bacteriophages but using them clinically has been very difficult.
The latest oral vaccines appear to offer around 87% protection against Vibrio Cholerae, at least in the short term, stockpiling this vaccine in developed countries with effective water treatment would be pointless really, there would be little possibility of spread. The fact that the illness develops so rapidly means that it is unlikely to be imported, an outbreak would require a breakdown of sanitation and an asymptomatic carrier, which seems to be what happened in Haiti.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(16)30211-X/fulltext
 
  • Like
Likes Baluncore and Ygggdrasil
  • #5
Baluncore said:
. Vaccinations often work well against viruses, but not so well against bacteria where they typically prevent only about half of the expected infections.

Medical carers cannot rely on vaccination against a bacterial threat in their workplace. Hand-washing and other hygienic practices are essential.

The childhood HiB, Pertussis, Pneumococcal and Tetanus vaccines (all bacteria) are 90%+ effective
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #6
BWV said:
The childhood HiB, Pertussis, Pneumococcal and Tetanus vaccines (all bacteria) are 90%+ effective
90%+ is wishful thinking, I do not believe you. Where do you get that data from ?

Tetanus is low-cost and effective, but children need 6 shots, then as adults need a booster shot every 10 years. According to wikipedia Pertussis whole-cell vaccine is about 78% effective. Pertussis, acellular vaccine is 71–85% effective. The effectiveness of the vaccines appears to decrease by between 2 and 10% per year with a more rapid decrease with the acellular vaccines.
 
  • #8
BWV said:
Either way that is a long way from ‘50% effectiveness for bacterial vaccines’
You are cherry picking and only considering the multi-dose childhood DtaP data from the first year. You are ignoring the 30% of children not fully protected 4 years later. The full CDC quote, with my bold is;
CDC said:
In studies demonstrating the efficacy of the pertussis component of DTaP:
98% of children who get all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule are fully protected against pertussis within the year following the last dose.
About 71% of children who get all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule are fully protected against pertussis 5 years after getting the last dose of DTaP.
In studies demonstrating the efficacy of the pertussis component of Tdap:
About 73% of adolescents are fully protected against pertussis in the first year after vaccination.
About 34% of people are fully protected against pertussis 4 years after vaccination.
Given the population distribution in those groups I would say that less than half of the population was protected.
 
  • #9
Ok but your are straining at gnats, all I was doing was objecting to your blanket statement, which was posted without a reference, that vaccines against bacterial diseases "typically prevent only about half of the expected infections"
 
  • #10

1. What is cholera and how does it spread?

Cholera is a bacterial infection that causes severe diarrhea and dehydration. It is usually spread through contaminated water or food, especially in areas with poor sanitation and hygiene.

2. What is a cholera vaccine and how does it work?

A cholera vaccine is a medication that helps to protect against cholera. It works by triggering the body's immune response to produce antibodies that can fight off the cholera bacteria.

3. Why are cholera vaccines being tried out?

Cholera vaccines are being tried out in order to prevent and control outbreaks of cholera in areas where the disease is prevalent. This can help to reduce the number of people who become infected and decrease the severity of the disease.

4. How effective are cholera vaccines?

The effectiveness of cholera vaccines can vary depending on the type of vaccine and the population being vaccinated. However, studies have shown that some vaccines can be up to 90% effective in preventing cholera.

5. Are there any side effects of cholera vaccines?

Like any medication, there can be some potential side effects of cholera vaccines, such as mild fever, headache, or muscle pain. However, these side effects are usually mild and temporary, and the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh any potential risks.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
15
Replies
516
Views
26K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top