Cholesky decomp vs A = L'DL decomp.

  • Thread starter Thread starter WCMU101
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical relationship between the Cholesky decomposition of a symmetric, positive-definite matrix (A) expressed as A = LDLT and A = LTDL. The user, Nick, seeks to understand how the L and D matrices from these two decompositions relate to each other. It is concluded that while there is a method to derive LTDL from LDLT by working backwards, the relationship between the matrices is not straightforward and lacks a clear mathematical connection in general cases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cholesky decomposition
  • Familiarity with symmetric, positive-definite matrices
  • Knowledge of matrix algebra and operations
  • Experience with numerical algorithms for matrix factorization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of symmetric positive-definite matrices
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Cholesky decomposition
  • Learn about the numerical stability of matrix decompositions
  • Explore algorithms for matrix factorization beyond Cholesky, such as LU decomposition
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, data scientists, and engineers working with numerical methods, particularly those involved in matrix computations and optimizations in machine learning or computational mathematics.

WCMU101
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey all. I've written an algorithm to find the Cholesky decomposition of a symmetric, positive-definite matrix (A). I've used the algorithm from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholesky_decomposition#Avoiding_taking_square_roots

Ok here is my question. My current algorithm solves for A = LDLT, however I would also like to solve for A = LTDL. I've seen the results of both decompositions and it looks like they are related. From what I've seen it looks like the L returned from L'DL is just L from cholesky inverted about the positively sloped diagonal. And same for the D. So for example:

A =

4 2 2
2 4 2
2 2 4

A = LDL'

L =
1 0 0
0.5 1 0
0.5 0.333333 1

D =
4 0 0
0 3 0
0 0 2.66667

A = L'DL

L =

1.0000 0 0
0.3333 1.0000 0
0.5000 0.5000 1.0000

D =
2.6667 0 0
0 3.0000 0
0 0 4.0000

So my question. How can I relate the L from LDL' decomp with the L from L'DL decomp (mathematically).

Thanks,

Nick.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your example matrix is a special case because it also "symmetrical top to bottom" and "left to right".

For a general symmmetric matrix, you can get the L^T D L decomoposition by running the L D L^T "backwards" starting from the bottom right corner and working to the top left, but the result will not be as you described it. There is no obvious connection between the two sets of L and D matrices.

As a simple example, take the matrix

1 1
1 2
 
Thanks for that! Exactly what I needed to know.

Nick.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K