Choosing a heater band for vacuum system bakeout

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on selecting the appropriate wattage for a heater band intended for a cylindrical stainless steel vacuum chamber, measuring approximately 2 feet in length and 0.5 feet in diameter. The user calculated a required wattage of 2000W to achieve and maintain a temperature of 200°C, factoring in heat loss to the environment. Key considerations include the significant heat loss due to convection and radiation, as well as the importance of insulation, such as mineral wool, to improve thermal efficiency. The use of multiple heater bands is recommended for better temperature uniformity and regulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal conductivity, particularly in stainless steel (304)
  • Knowledge of heat transfer principles, including convection and radiation
  • Familiarity with insulation materials, specifically mineral wool
  • Experience with temperature control in vacuum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thermal properties of stainless steel 304 for better design decisions
  • Learn about heat loss calculations in vacuum systems, focusing on convection and radiation
  • Investigate insulation options and their effectiveness in high-temperature applications
  • Explore the design and implementation of multiple heater bands for improved thermal regulation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mechanical engineers, thermal system designers, and professionals involved in vacuum technology and thermal management, particularly those working with heater bands and insulation in high-temperature environments.

JoJoQuinoa
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to find the right wattage heater band for a cylindrical vacuum chamber that is stainless steel (304), ~2ft in length, ~0.5ft in diameter, and ~0.5 in thick.

From a quick google search, I was able to calculate the required wattage for bring the chamber up to and constant at 200C from room temperature. The bake time will be 1 hour from room temp to the desired temp and 11 hours at the desired temp. However, what I'm confused on is how to account for the heat loss to the air. Is it significant to be accounted for?

Thanks in advance,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
See Example 9.2 on page 14 of this PDF file. Ball park guestimate from that example and its comments on radiation yields 2000W of heat loss to the environment.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kifah_Sarraf/post/What_should_the_force_in_the_momentum_conservation_equation_be_in_a_natural_convection_problem_that_has_air_as_the_working_fluid/attachment/59d636d579197b80779943b1/AS%3A390557672198147%401470127613757/download/Chapter9_Free-Convection_Bergman_6th-ed.pdf

(above found with:
https://www.google.com/search?&q=convection+loss+200C+to+free+air)

(I hope there are some experts around here to chime in!)

Cheers,
Tom
 
A couple of notes:
A device like this would typically be thoroughly insulated (mineral wool). Without insulation, local cooling will allow a large gradient across the unit.

SS is a horrible thermal conductor. You will get better uniformity (and regulation) with multiple heater bands.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
441
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K