Choosing coefficients for eigenvectors.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors for the operator \(\hat{M} = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & i\sqrt{2} \\ -i\sqrt{2} & 2 \end{pmatrix}\) in the orthonormal basis \(|1\rangle\) and \(|2\rangle\). Participants emphasize the importance of choosing a free parameter, such as setting it to 1, to normalize the eigenvector. Additionally, they discuss constructing projectors for the normalized eigenvectors and verifying closure and orthogonality relations, specifically ensuring \(\langle\Psi_{1N}|\Psi_{2N}\rangle = 0\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
  • Familiarity with normalization of vectors in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of orthonormal bases and their properties.
  • Ability to construct and verify projection operators in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate eigenvalues and eigenvectors for complex matrices.
  • Study normalization techniques for quantum states and their implications.
  • Explore the construction of projection operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate closure and orthogonality relations in the context of quantum states.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying linear algebra applications in physics, as well as educators looking for insights on teaching eigenvalue problems.

Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


For the following operator represented in the orthonormal basis {|1>, |2>}

[tex]\hat{M} = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 2 & i\sqrt{2} \\<br /> -i\sqrt{2 & 2}<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors and express them as a function of |1> and |2> normalized.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to apply what I learned way back in linear algebra. When I solve for the eigenvector coefficients, I end up with a system of 2 variables and 1 equation (alternatively 2 variables and a rank 1 matrix), which gives me (2 - 1) free parameters to set arbitrarily. However back in algebra I used to just pick a variable "gamma" or whatever and leave my eigenvector in terms of it. Now I'm supposed to fix an actual number to it? For what reason and how should I pick my free parameters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lavabug said:

Homework Statement


For the following operator represented in the orthonormal basis {|1>, |2>}

[tex]\hat{M} = <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 2 & i\sqrt{2} \\<br /> -i\sqrt{2} & 2<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors and express them as a function of |1> and |2> normalized.


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to apply what I learned way back in linear algebra. When I solve for the eigenvector coefficients, I end up with a system of 2 variables and 1 equation (alternatively 2 variables and a rank 1 matrix), which gives me (2 - 1) free parameters to set arbitrarily. However back in algebra I used to just pick a variable "gamma" or whatever and leave my eigenvector in terms of it. Now I'm supposed to fix an actual number to it? For what reason and how should I pick my free parameters?
Why? Because the problem is asking you to. :wink:

Just arbitrarily set the free parameter to, say, 1, and then normalize the resulting vector.
 
vela said:
Why? Because the problem is asking you to. :wink:

Just arbitrarily set the free parameter to, say, 1, and then normalize the resulting vector.

Thanks. Today we went over an identical problem in class, what we did was basically write down the eigenvector as a function of only 1 coefficient, then impose the orthonormalization condition to solve for it to get the normalized eigenvector.

I forgot to mention the other part of the problem:

Write down in matrix form the projectors over the 2 normalized eigenvectors. Verify that they satisfy the closure and orthogonality relations.
Last one seems straightforward, just check that my 2 eigenvectors satisfy [itex]\langle\Psi_{1N}|\Psi_{2N}\rangle = 0[/itex].

But I have no idea how the first thing is done. From my notes it looks like we wrote down the unit matrix in the form of dot products between the unit vectors, and stuck the projection operator in between the dot products for each.

Checking for closure I understand is just adding up the projection operators to see if they give the identity matrix, but I need to understand the previous part of the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K