Choosing Redundant Forces for Structural Stability?

1 reply · 2K views · last reply
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In this example , the author said that we can choose either G or E as redundant and ignore the force when we are doing the analysis ...
I was told by my lecturer that when we are choosing the redundant forces , it''s important that after removing the redundant force , the whole structure remain stable .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Hoewever , I think that we can choose the force at E as redudant and remove it when we are doing the analysis. This is because by doing so , the whole structure would become unstable . So , I think we can only choose the support at G as redundant force
 
Attachments
  • Free-body diagram of a truss with supports at A, G and E, loads of 30 kN at H and F and 40 kN at D, and 30 m panel spacing with a 24 m height.
    597.PNG
    30.9 KB · Views: 521
  • Truss diagram with pinned support at A, roller supports at G and E, joints B, C, D, H and F, and a 40 kN load at top of D, 30 kN loads at H and F, 60 kN at E, with member forces labelled in kN.
    598.PNG
    21.5 KB · Views: 495
  • Truss diagram with loads: 1 kN applied at joint G, supports at A and E, member lengths 1.25 m and 0.8 m, with a table of member lengths, areas, internal forces F' and F values and total 35690 and 637.6, plus the redundant reaction formula R_G.
    599.png
    40.6 KB · Views: 515
Why would removing E make it unstable? If you remove E, the pin at A would be 'pulled' upwards and the support at G would have a greater weight on it. That's not unstable at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh