As far as I can tell, in GR, the Chirstoffel symbol in the expression of the Connection is analogous to the vector potential, A, in the definition of the Covariant Derivative.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Chirstoffel symbol compensates for changes in curvature and helps define what it means for a tensor to remain constant from one point to another.

Does this mean that the vector potential A is necessary to define what it means for a classical field to remain constant from one point to another? This doesn’t seem right because we still have A in Minkowski space expressions.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Christoffel Symbol vs. Vector Potential

Tags:

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Christoffel Symbol Vector | Date |
---|---|

A Lense-Thirring effect - General Relativity | Feb 27, 2018 |

I Manipulating Christoffel symbols | Oct 26, 2017 |

I Is the Christoffel symbol orthogonal to the four-velocity? | May 27, 2017 |

I Christoffel symbols of Schwarzschild metric with Lagrangian | Sep 4, 2016 |

Christoffel Symbols of Vectors and One-Forms in say Polar Coordinates | Nov 18, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**