Circuits: What is wrong with my polarities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I am working on this transient problem. When the switch is open, current only flows in the right loop and so the initial current on the inductor is io+ = 4A flowinf downward through the inductor.

When the switch is thrown at t = 0, the other loop gets started. I reduced the circuit to a Thevenin equivalent as shown. Now, I know that I am supposed to be solving for the i(t) shown in the last diagram, but I know from the 6A current source in the second to last diagram that my the real current is flowing in the opposite direction. So instead, I will solve for the real current iR(t) flowing counter clockwise and then just negate it to yield the i(t) asked for.


Since I know the direction of the real current iR(t), I have labeled the polarities of my circuit elements accordingly. However, when I solve the loop equation:

1.
(12/5)*iR + 10*i'R = 72/5​

using the Laplace transform, I get

2.
(12/5)*I(s)R + 10*sIR(s) - 10*4 = 72/5​

3.
iR(t) = 6[1 - (1/3)*e-6t/25]​

so that

4.
i(t) = 2*e-6t/25 - 6​

But the answer in the book is

5.
i(t) = 10*e-6t/25 - 6​

which I can rectify by messing with the signs in my loop equation. What am I doing wrong here?

Perhaps it has to do with the fact that my initial condition is a negative current with respect to iR, so instead of subtracting it in the Laplace domain (equation 2), I should have added it? Actually, I am quite confident that that is what it is. What do you think?


EDIT Solved: That was the mistake. Since the initial current through the inductor was 'downward,' it was directed opposite my assumed positive direction for iR(t). So when the Laplace calls for the IC, the sign has to be consistent.

ckt1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The correct equation is then2.(12/5)*I(s)R + 10*sIR(s) + 10*4 = 72/5 which yields 3.iR(t) = 6[1 + (1/3)*e-6t/25] and 4.i(t) = 10*e-6t/25 - 6As expected. Homework Equations1.(12/5)*iR + 10*i'R = 72/5 2.(12/5)*I(s)R + 10*sIR(s) - 10*4 = 72/5 3.iR(t) = 6[1 - (1/3)*e-6t/25] The Attempt at a Solution I figured out that I was making a mistake in my Laplace transform. I assumed that the initial current through the inductor was in the same direction as iR, but it was actually in the opposite direction. So when I went to compute the Laplace transform, I had to add the 4 A instead of subtracting it. Once I made this change, the equation yielded the correct answer.