Circular motion (approximation of centripetal acc.)

Click For Summary
A body moving in a circle with constant velocity experiences an average acceleration that can be approximated as (v√2)/(T/4) over a quarter of the circumference. This approximation is due to the average acceleration being calculated over a time interval where the direction of the velocity vector changes significantly. Instantaneous acceleration varies more in larger time intervals, making the approximation less accurate. A smaller time interval yields a closer approximation to the true centripetal acceleration because the direction of acceleration changes less. The discussion concludes with a reference to how centripetal acceleration can be expressed as (ω^2)*r or (v^2)/r.
V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
Say I have a body moving in a circle of radius r with a constant velocity v.

The time it takes the body to go around the circumference once is:

T = 2πr/v

Then the time it takes the body to go around a fourth of the circumference is T/4.

Now, imagine a diagram where when the body is at the leftmost portion of the circumference its velocity vector is pointing straight up, and when it is at the upmost portion of the circumference its velocity vector points entirely to the right. That is the body traveling over a fourth of the circumference.

Now, the magnitude of the acceleration vector required to make the body behave that way over a period of T/4 is (v√2)/(T/4). And (v√2)/(T/4) is an approximation of the centripetal acceleration for this case.

My question is: why is that an approximation? Why if I do the same thing over a smaller change in time I get closer to the centripetal acceleration? A circle is symmetric and the velocity is constant, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
Say I have a body moving in a circle of radius r with a constant velocity v.

The time it takes the body to go around the circumference once is:

T = 2πr/v

Then the time it takes the body to go around a fourth of the circumference is T/4.

Now, imagine a diagram where when the body is at the leftmost portion of the circumference its velocity vector is pointing straight up, and when it is at the upmost portion of the circumference its velocity vector points entirely to the right. That is the body traveling over a fourth of the circumference.
Agreed, so far.
Now, the magnitude of the acceleration vector ...
Not quite. This is the magnitude of the average acceleration, where the average acceleration is defined as
\vec{a_{avg}}=\frac{\Delta \vec{v}}{\Delta t}

... required to make the body behave that way over a period of T/4 is (v√2)/(T/4). And (v√2)/(T/4) is an approximation of the centripetal acceleration for this case.

My question is: why is that an approximation?
Because it is an average, and the actual instantaneous acceleration changes substantially (because it changes direction) during the time interval.
Why if I do the same thing over a smaller change in time I get closer to the centripetal acceleration?
Because, for a small time interval, the acceleration does not change direction very much, and is more closely approximated by its average over that time interval.
A circle is symmetric and the velocity is constant, right?
No, velocity is a vector and is not constant if its direction changes. Speed is constant, however.
 
That helped a lot! Thanks!

One for additional question though. How does all of that get summarised into (ω^2)*r or (v^2)/r?
 
You're welcome :smile:

This explains things pretty well:

http://scienceblogs.com/dotphysics/2009/07/basics-centripetal-acceleration/
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K