Circular motion, friction and forces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to circular motion, specifically focusing on the forces acting on a cylinder in motion and the role of friction as a centripetal force. Participants are exploring the dynamics of the situation, including how to calculate when the cylinder might fall off.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of drawing a diagram to visualize forces, question the role of height in the problem, and explore the relationship between friction and centripetal force. There are attempts to calculate maximum centripetal force and radial acceleration, with some participants expressing confusion about their calculations and assumptions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and guidance on the calculations involved, particularly regarding the relationship between friction and centripetal force. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of height and the correct interpretation of the variables involved. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered, and participants are engaging in clarifying discussions.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of missing information, such as the height of the cylinder, which is noted as potentially significant to the problem. Additionally, language barriers are acknowledged, which may affect understanding of the problem setup.

hankrinsen
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A sylinder with a mass of 5kg is placed on a distance R from the rotation centre of a carousel. The carousel uses 2 seconds on one round. How far away from the centre can we place the sylinder without it falling of, given a friction number of 0.7 (maximum).
Relevant Equations
friction = μ*n
I am not really sure how to go about this. I have been sick for a couple of weeks and fallen behind a bit. Can anyone help me out please? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @hankrinsen, sorry to hear about that! Hope you're better now, and

:welcome:

Have you tried drawing a diagram of the setup?
 
1587294508169.png

This is attached to the assignment. English is my second language, so i might have misunderstood what you mean by diagram
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
That's a good start; what forces are acting on the cylinder, and what are their magnitudes and directions? It is good practice to draw all the forces onto the diagram.
 
I have found that the sum of forces must be facing inwards towards the circle, And I have come to the conclusion that the friction is the centripetal force in this instance. The friction force should be the only force working here. Therefore I am confused as to how i calculate when the cylinder will fall of. Friction force should be 0.7*9.81*5 = 34.335N
 
I think height of the cylinder is also matter
 
wrobel said:
I think height of the cylinder is also matter
How? The height is not given
 
hankrinsen said:
I have found that the sum of forces must be facing inwards towards the circle, And I have come to the conclusion that the friction is the centripetal force in this instance. The friction force should be the only force working here. Therefore I am confused as to how i calculate when the cylinder will fall of. Friction force should be 0.7*9.81*5 = 34.335N

That's right, friction provides the centripetal force. The formula ##F = \mu N## you've given corresponds to the maximum possible frictional force (more generally we might say ##F \leq \mu N##).

So you've calculated the maximum centripetal force, and that must correspond to your highest possible radial acceleration. Since the angular velocity is fixed, that naturally corresponds to the highest possible radius.

What is the formula for radial acceleration for circular motion, and then can you apply ##F_r = ma_r##?
 
hankrinsen said:
How? The height is not given
the cylinder can topple over
 
  • #10
etotheipi said:
That's right, friction provides the centripetal force. The formula ##F = \mu N## you've given corresponds to the maximum possible frictional force (more generally we might say ##F \leq \mu N##).

So you've calculated the maximum centripetal force, and that must correspond to your highest possible radial acceleration. Since the angular velocity is fixed, that naturally corresponds to the highest possible radius.

What is the formula for radial acceleration for circular motion, and then can you apply ##F_r = ma_r##?
So this means the highest possible radial acceleration must be 6.867 m/s^2.
The radial acceleration --> A=v^2/r ---> 6.367=v^2/r

To find velocity i find the circumference of one rotation and divide it by time. It takes 2 seconds to finish one rotation with a circumference of 2*pi*r, so the velocity is pi*r

I put it in the equation for max radial acceleration; 6.367 = ((pi*r)^2)/r ---> 6.367 = pi^2*r --> r = 6.367/pi^2

Which gives me that it can be put a maximum og 0.645r from the center without falling off? I might be way off here...
 
  • #11
hankrinsen said:
So this means the highest possible radial acceleration must be 6.867 m/s^2.
The radial acceleration --> A=v^2/r ---> 6.367=v^2/r

To find velocity i find the circumference of one rotation and divide it by time. It takes 2 seconds to finish one rotation with a circumference of 2*pi*r, so the velocity is pi*r

I put it in the equation for max radial acceleration; 6.367 = ((pi*r)^2)/r ---> 6.367 = pi^2*r --> r = 6.367/pi^2

Which gives me that it can be put a maximum og 0.645r from the center without falling off? I might be way off here...

Most of this looks good, though I'm not sure why you included an ##r## in your final answer. You already gave that ##r = \frac{a_r}{{\pi}^2}##, and this should just give you a number. Also, make sure to use the unrounded value for ##a_r##, and try to avoid truncating the decimal too soon!

Notice also that ##a_r = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{r^2 \omega^2}{r} = r \omega^{2}##; this last expression can be a little faster if you're dealing with time periods, where ##\omega = \frac{2\pi}{T}##. But your consideration of time for one revolution is also perfectly valid.

In that way, I might have solved it like ##\mu N = mr\omega^2 \implies 0.7 \times 9.81 = r \times (\frac{2\pi}{2})^{2}##.
 
  • #12
etotheipi said:
Most of this looks good, though I'm not sure why you included an ##r## in your final answer. You already gave that ##r = \frac{a_r}{{\pi}^2}##, and this should just give you a number. Also, make sure to use the unrounded value for ##a_r##, and try to avoid truncating the decimal too soon!

Notice also that ##a_r = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{r^2 \omega^2}{r} = r \omega^{2}##; this last expression can be a little faster if you're dealing with time periods, where ##\omega = \frac{2\pi}{T}##. But your consideration of time for one revolution is also perfectly valid.

In that way, I might have solved it like ##\mu N = mr\omega^2 \implies 0.7 \times 9.81 = r \times (\frac{2\pi}{2})^{2}##.
aha, i thought that since the distance from center is given as r in the assignment, i should give the answer as r aswell, since i can't really know if they are talking about meters or what..
 
  • #13
hankrinsen said:
aha, i thought that since the distance from center is given as r in the assignment, i should give the answer as r aswell, since i can't really know if they are talking about meters or what..

Well in this case ##r## just represents a distance, and you can give a distance as a product of a certain number and a chosen unit. Since you did the calculation with other SI quantities, these units are going to simplify down to metres; however, so long as you're careful, you can give ##r## in whatever units you like.
 
  • #14
Alright, thank you very much! I understand it a bit more now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K