Circular motion- friction exerted skates/ice and determine friction coefficient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a speed skater negotiating a turn, focusing on the frictional force between the skates and the ice, and determining the coefficient of friction. The context is circular motion and friction in a physics setting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve for the frictional force and the coefficient of friction using equations related to circular motion and friction. Some participants suggest alternative methods for calculating the frictional force.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes verification of the original poster's calculations and methods. Participants are exploring different approaches to the same problem, with some confirming that the methods discussed are equivalent.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses a desire for verification of their answers and adherence to significant figures, indicating a focus on accuracy in their calculations.

dani123
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 65-kg speed skater with a velocity of 15.0m/s comes into a turn on the track of radius 25.0m.

a) How much friction must be exerted between the skates and the ice to negotiate the turn?

b) Determine the coefficient of friction between the skates and the surface of the ice.

Homework Equations



For part a) I used:
Fc=Ff
v2=μgR
Ff=μmg

For part b) I used:
μ=Ff/Fn

The Attempt at a Solution



For part a) I rearranged the v2=μgR equation to solve for μ=0.918

and then subbed that into the Ff=μmg equation and solved for Ff=585N

For part b) I used μ=Ff/Fn and used m=65kg and g=9.8m/s2 to give μ=0.918

If someone could verify that I did this question correctly that would be greatly appreciated! and that my significant figures are being respected! Thank you so much for your help and time :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a you could have simply used F_f = F_c = m v^2 / r. For part b you could have used the value for \mu you calculated for part a.
 
So are my answers wrong or are they correct but i just found a different way of finding them ? haha
 
I didn't check the numbers. As for the physics, see if what you said and what I said are equivalent.
 
yup they do! thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
22K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K