Circular Motion: Proof for Non-Uniform Circular Motion Acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of acceleration in non-uniform circular motion, contrasting it with uniform circular motion. The centripetal acceleration formula, a = v²/r, is established for both types of motion, but in non-uniform motion, the angular velocity (ω) is variable, leading to a changing centripetal acceleration. The proof utilizes polar coordinates, resulting in expressions for tangential acceleration (aₜ = r * d²θ/dt²) and normal acceleration (aᵣ = -r * (dθ/dt)²). The total acceleration is calculated as aₜotal = √(aᵣ² + aₜ²).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their basis vectors (r̂ and θ̂).
  • Familiarity with differentiation and its application in physics.
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its relationship with linear velocity.
  • Basic concepts of centripetal and tangential acceleration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration in uniform circular motion.
  • Explore the implications of variable angular velocity on circular motion dynamics.
  • Learn about the relationship between tangential and centripetal acceleration in non-uniform circular motion.
  • Investigate real-world applications of non-uniform circular motion in engineering and physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching circular motion concepts, and engineers involved in dynamics and motion analysis will benefit from this discussion.

GeneralOJB
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I have seen the derivation of the centripetal acceleration formula a=v^2/r by saying r= rcosθi+isinθj=rcosωti+rsinωtj and differentiating twice. Since ω is constant we get a=-ω^{2}r.

I've started looking at non-uniform circular motion where there is also the tangential acceleration vector component. I'm told that the component of acceleration directed towards the center of the circle has magnitude v^2/r, but I don't believe the original proof works because we assumed ω is constant, and now it isn't. Can this type of proof be made to work still?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure. Then you write
\vec{r}(t)=r \cos [\theta(t)] \vec{i} + r \sin[\theta(t)] \vec{j}
and differentiate twice (assuming r=\text{const}, because it's supposed to be a circular motion). Then you get
\vec{v}(t)=\dot{\vec{r}}(t) = -r \dot{\theta} \sin \theta \vec{i} + r \dot{\theta} \cos \theta \vec{j}=r \dot{\theta} \hat{\theta},
\vec{a}(t)=\dot{\vec{r}}(t)=-r \ddot{\theta} \sin \theta \vec{i} - r \dot{\theta}^2 \cos \theta \vec{i} + r \ddot{\theta} \cos \theta \vec{j} - r \dot{\theta}^2 \sin \theta \vec{j} =r \ddot{\theta} \hat{\theta}-r \dot{\theta}^2 \hat{r}.
Here I have used the orthonormal basis of the polar coordinates,
\hat{r}=\cos \theta \vec{i} + \sin \theta \vec{j}, \quad \hat{\theta}=-\sin \theta \vec{i}+\cos \theta \vec{j}.
It's clear that \hat{r} points perpendicularly outward from the circle (normal of the curve) and \hat{\theta} along the circle (tangent of the curve).

That shows that the tangential acceleration is
a_{\theta} = \hat{\theta} \cdot \vec{a}=r \ddot \theta
and the normal acceleration is indeed the momentaneous centripetal acceleration as in uniform circlar motion,
a_{r}=\hat{r} \cdot \vec{a} = -r \dot{\theta}^2.
It's easy to calculate that also then
a_{r}=-\frac{\vec{v}^2}{r}.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In uniform circular motion ω is constant which means centripetal acceleration ac2R is constant .

In case of non uniform circular motion centripetal acceleration is still given by ac2R ,but as you have rightly said ω is changing ,which means centripetal acceleration is also varying (magnitude changing with time).

In addition there is also tangential acceleration aT = dv/dt .

The net acceleration of the object is given by the vector sum of the two i.e ac and aT .

Since they are at right angles the magnitude is given by aTotal = √(ac2 + aT2)
 
Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
906
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K