Citing objections in a poster presentation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the appropriateness of including objections and agreements in a poster presentation. It is established that while feedback from journal editors can be valuable, citing such criticisms directly on a poster is generally discouraged. Instead, the focus should be on presenting a clear problem statement, methodology, and key results to engage viewers effectively. The consensus is that a poster should serve as a concise trigger for discussion rather than a detailed history of the research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of poster presentation formats
  • Familiarity with academic feedback processes
  • Knowledge of effective communication in research dissemination
  • Experience in summarizing research methodologies and results
NEXT STEPS
  • Research best practices for academic poster design
  • Learn about effective methods for summarizing research findings
  • Explore techniques for engaging an audience during presentations
  • Investigate the role of feedback in refining research presentations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, graduate students, and academic professionals involved in creating and presenting posters at conferences or academic events.

rogerharris
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
i'm doing a poster presentation of a paper i have written and would like to include both objections and agreement with the paper in a separate box for each called strengths and weaknesses

if for example a journal editor gave me a lot of corrections or weaknesses which helped develop particular models can i incorporate them and mention how his feedback helped illustrate a weakness of the model ?

I'm going to write to them anyway, but just in case they don't get back in time i would be wondering what its ok to quote..e.g. in a paper you can say something like (personal correspondence, smith 2009)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think I understand why anyone would want to do something like this.

The point of a poster is to showcase your research. It's usually not the place to cite objections or criticisms from journal editors.

Imagine, for example, I am a professor in your field. I come strolling along down the poster aisle and stop in front of your poster. What do you want me to see?

In general I like to see:
- a clear presentation of the problem you're working on
- a quick summary of the methodology used
- the important results this work has generated
- a few brief discussion points

People don't want to see a history of the project in a poster. If they want details, they'll ask. The poster is, in my opinion, supposed to serve as both a trigger and reference point for discussion of your work.

Of course, it's a poster. You can really do what you want with it. But my experience has found that you'll get a lot more interest if you keep it consise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
24K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
17K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K