MHB City Population Growth: A Unique Algebra Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a unique algebra problem involving population growth in a city, where the population at the end of 2016 is stated to be two times larger than it was at the end of 2001. The problem requires calculating the percentage increase in population from the end of 2001 to the end of 2007, using logarithmic values provided. A key point is the interpretation of "two times larger," which is clarified to mean three times as large, affecting the calculations. The solution involves using exponential growth formulas and logarithms to derive the population increase. Participants are encouraged to share their methods for solving the problem, highlighting its complexity.
Tompson Lee
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey, I found an interesting algebra problem combined with log. It was quite an unique one so I wanted to share it with you guys.

Problem: There is a city where the population increases at a constant rate. At the end of 2016, the population of the city was 2 times larger than the population 15 years ago (the end of 2001). Find as a percentage, how much did the population at the end of 2007 increase compared to the end of 2001? Use 0.12 as log1.32 and 0.30 as log2.

I believe that this is quite difficult one to solve. It took me over an hour to solve it. Please tell me your guys way to solve it since that was my purpose to post this not to know the answer.

Thanks

Solution:
[YOUTUBE]sTK8Tu32VMA[/YOUTUBE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Tompson Lee said:
Hey, I found an interesting algebra problem combined with log. It was quite an unique one so I wanted to share it with you guys.

Problem: There is a city where the population increases at a constant rate.
So, letting "x(t)" be the population at time t (in years), dx/dt= kx where x is the constant rate of increase. Then dx/x= kdt so ln(x)= kt+ C so x(t)= C'e^{kt} where C'= e^C. Taking t= 0 to be 2001, the population in 2001 to be x0, C'= x0. The population t years after 2001 is x0e^{kt}.

At the end of 2016, the population of the city was 2 times larger than the population 15 years ago (the end of 2001).
Note that "2 times larger than" is NOT "twice as large". "2 times larger than" is "three times as large".

At the end of 2016, 15 years after 2001, x(15)= x0e^{15k}= 3x0 so e^{15k}= 3. We can use the natural logarithm to say that k= ln(3)/15. x0e^{kt}= x0e^{ln(3)t/15}

Find as a percentage, how much did the population at the end of 2007 increase compared to the end of 2001? Use 0.12 as log1.32 and 0.30 as log2.
2007 is 6 years after 2001 so the population is x0e^{6ln(3)/15}= x0 e^{2ln(3)/5}. The ratio with the population at 2001 is x(5)/x_0= e^{2ln(3)/5}. This can be written as (e^{ln(3)})^{2/5)= 3^{2/5}.

I have no idea why this would want you to use the common logarithm to solve. Does anyone still use that? But, anyway, with x= 3^{2/5}, log(x)= (2/5)log(3)= (2/5)(0.48) (to two decimal places)= 0.19.

I believe that this is quite difficult one to solve. It took me over an hour to solve it. Please tell me your guys way to solve it since that was my purpose to post this not to know the answer.

Thanks

Solution:
Since you are given "log(2)" rather than "log(3)", perhaps this solution is interpreting "two times larger" as "twice as large". If so, that is wrong!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top