First off, what is a mass eigenstate?! Is there a (hermitian) operator associated to mass? What should I picture when discussing a non-mass-eigenstate?! The same goes for a 'weak eigenstate' as the CKM matrix is supposed to be the basis transformation between these two...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The I read that 'a linear transformation which diagonalizes the mass terms of the u-type quarks does not necessarily diagonalize those of the d-type quarks.'

What does this mean, and why not?! :grumpy:

Finally, I rwill be very much helped by any insight on the meaning of this matrix and its properties, e.g. why its unitary...?

Sorry, the more I learn the less I seem to know...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# CKM Matrix and mass eigenstates

Loading...

Similar Threads - Matrix mass eigenstates | Date |
---|---|

A Question about the matrix of a pseudoscalar meson | Jan 20, 2018 |

A Reduced matrix element for 0_ --> 0+ forbidden beta decay | Aug 9, 2017 |

A Calculation a reduced matrix element using E-Wigner Th. | Aug 5, 2017 |

I Transformation matrix from Dirac to Weyl | Jun 6, 2017 |

The difference between the weak and mass eigenstates in the PNMS matrix | Feb 2, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**