Clarification on length contraction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of length contraction in the context of special relativity, specifically addressing how the length of an object moving near the speed of light is perceived from a stationary reference frame. Participants explore the implications of measuring length in different frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the length of an object traveling near the speed of light, as measured from a stationary reference frame, would be shorter than its proper length.
  • Another participant suggests that the length could be either shorter or longer, indicating uncertainty in the interpretation of the measurements.
  • A later reply clarifies that, within an inertial frame, it is not possible for an object's length to be longer than its proper length, reinforcing the idea of length contraction.
  • One participant expresses agreement with the clarification regarding the limitations of length measurements in inertial frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is some agreement that length cannot exceed proper length in an inertial frame, but there is disagreement regarding the interpretation of length measurements, with some participants suggesting it could be either shorter or longer.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the definitions of proper length and reference frames, as well as the conditions under which length measurements are made.

benk99nenm312
Messages
302
Reaction score
0
I ask this just to clarify something, because something I read threw me off earlier.

An object travels near the speed of light, and you are stationary. You measure the object somehow, and find it's length from your reference frame. Would it's length be shorter or longer than the proper length?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shorter.
 
benk99nenm312 said:
I ask this just to clarify something, because something I read threw me off earlier.

An object travels near the speed of light, and you are stationary. You measure the object somehow, and find it's length from your reference frame. Would it's length be shorter or longer than the proper length?

Thanks in advance.

Either.
 
phyti said:
Either.
As long as you're using an inertial frame, it's not possible for an object's length to be longer than its proper length (length in its own rest frame).
 
JesseM said:
As long as you're using an inertial frame, it's not possible for an object's length to be longer than its proper length (length in its own rest frame).

That's what I thought.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K