Clarify remark from Landau's Mechanics

  • Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mechanics
In summary, Landau discusses the potential U(q) for small deviations from a stable equilibrium, which can be expressed as a polynomial expansion. The kinetic energy of a free particle in one dimension is also a polynomial function with a coefficient that depends on the generalized coordinate q. This expansion is allowed and exists due to the Taylor expansion of U(q) around q0, and is applicable for any potential that is twice differentiable at q0.
  • #1
WiFO215
420
1
While discussing the small oscillations of particles about a stable equilibrium, Landau writes

...The potential U(q) for small deviations can be expressed as a polynomial
[tex] U(q) - U(q_{0}) = \frac{1}{2}k(q - q_{0})^{2} [/tex]

...The kinetic energy of a free particle in one dimension is generally of the form
[tex]\frac{1}{2}a(q)\dot{q}^{2}[/tex]

...

Where q is the generalized co-ordinate.

Section 21, Volume 1

1. How do you know such a polynomial expansion for q is allowed? How do you know it exists? After all, this is any old U with its first derivative 0 at q0.
2. Why does the co-efficient of [tex]\dot{q}^{2}[/tex] have to be a function of q? I thought it'd be a constant.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
anirudh215 said:
2. Why does the co-efficient of [tex]\dot{q}^{2}[/tex] have to be a function of q? I thought it'd be a constant.
A generalized coordinate q will be some function of the ordinary cartesian coordinate x. For concreteness, let's say q = x³, or x = q1/3.

The kinetic energy is then

[tex] T = \frac{1}{2} m \dot{x}^2 = \frac{m}{18q^{4/3}} \dot{q}^2 = \frac{1}{2} a(q) \dot{q}^2 [/tex]

with a(q) = m/9q4/3
 
  • #3
anirudh215 said:
1. How do you know such a polynomial expansion for q is allowed? How do you know it exists? After all, this is any old U with its first derivative 0 at q0.

Expand U(q) as a taylor expansion around q0. The first order term will be zero since q0 is an equilibrium point.
 
  • #4
Oh! I didn't think of that. Thanks. What about question 1?
 
  • #5
[tex] U(q) = U(q_0) + \frac{dU}{dq}_{q_0} (q - q_0) + \frac{d^2U}{dq^2}_{q_0} \frac{(q - q_0)^2}{2} + ... [/tex]

[tex] U(q) - U(q_0) = \frac{d^2U}{dq^2}_{q_0} \frac{(q - q_0)^2}{2} + ... [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #6
dx said:
[tex] U(q) = U(q_0) + \frac{dU}{dq}_{q_0} (q - q_0) + \frac{d^2U}{dq^2}_{q_0} \frac{(q - q_0)^2}{2} + ... [/tex]

[tex] U(q) - U(q_0) = \frac{d^2U}{dq^2}_{q_0} \frac{(q - q_0)^2}{2} + ... [/tex]

I know how to Taylor expand that function. My question was how do you know such a thing exists for any potential.
 
  • #7
You can just think of this formula as something that applies for any potential which is twice differentiable at q0. Most physically meaningful potentials will of course be infinitely differentiable.
 
  • #8
Okay! Thank you!
 

1. What is Landau's Mechanics?

Landau's Mechanics is a branch of classical mechanics that was developed by the Soviet physicist Lev Landau. It is a theoretical framework for understanding the motion of particles and systems in various physical systems.

2. What does "clarify remark" mean in the context of Landau's Mechanics?

In Landau's Mechanics, "clarify remark" refers to a statement or explanation made by Landau in his work that may require further clarification or explanation to fully understand its significance or implications.

3. Why is it important to clarify remarks in Landau's Mechanics?

Clarifying remarks in Landau's Mechanics is important because it helps to ensure a thorough understanding of the concepts and principles presented in Landau's work. It also allows for further development and application of these ideas in other areas of physics.

4. How are remarks clarified in Landau's Mechanics?

Remarks in Landau's Mechanics are typically clarified through further explanations, examples, and mathematical derivations. Landau's work is known for its concise and rigorous approach, so clarification often involves breaking down complex concepts into simpler terms and providing step-by-step explanations.

5. What are some common misconceptions about "clarify remark" in Landau's Mechanics?

One common misconception is that clarifying remarks is a sign of inadequate or unclear writing on Landau's part. However, this is not the case as Landau's work is known for its clarity and precision. Another misconception is that clarifying remarks are limited to Landau's work, when in fact, it is a common practice in scientific literature to provide further explanations and clarifications for complex ideas.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
24
Views
971
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
815
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
909
Replies
5
Views
855
Replies
4
Views
769
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
489
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
127
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
716
Back
Top